首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Comparison of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and high-definition optical coherence tomography measurements of optic disc parameters
【24h】

Comparison of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy and high-definition optical coherence tomography measurements of optic disc parameters

机译:扫描激光检眼镜和高清光学相干断层扫描技术测量光盘参数的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To investigate the agreement between scanning laser ophthalmoscopy (Heidelberg retinal tomograph 3; HRT-3) and high-definition optical coherence tomography (HD-OCT) for measurements of optic nerve head (ONH) parameters. Methods: As part of a population-based cross-sectional study, 913 consecutive Chinese subjects aged 40 years and older underwent HRT-3 and HD-OCT imaging of the ONH after pupillary dilation. Limits of agreement (LOA) derived from Bland - Altman analysis were calculated for ONH measurements. Results: The mean age (±SD) of study participants was 54.2±7.2 years and 52.0% were men. The two instruments showed no difference in mean optic disc area measurements (1.98±0.37 for HD-OCT vs 1.98±0.39 mm for HRT-3, p=0.95). HD-OCT showed smaller rim area (1.29±0.24 vs 1.46±0.27 mm, p0.001), but bigger cup-related parameters (p0.001 for all) than HRT-3. The highest correlations between the instruments were observed for cup volume (r 2=0.74, p0.001) and disc area (r 2=0.62, p0.001). The correlations for cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), vertical CDR and rim area were lower (r 2=0.59, 0.48 and 0.24, respectively, p0.001 for all). The BlandeAltman plots demonstrated significant proportional bias for differences in all ONH parameters (p0.01 for all), with LOA greater for disc-related parameters (0.98-1.0) than cup-related parameters (0.26-0.50). Conclusions There are substantial disagreements between HRT-3 and HD-OCT in ONH measurements. Although optic disc area measurements were similar, HD-OCT underestimates the rim area and overestimates cup parameters compared with HRT-3.
机译:目的:探讨扫描激光检眼镜(海德堡视网膜断层扫描仪3; HRT-3)与高清光学相干断层扫描(HD-OCT)在测量视神经乳头(ONH)参数方面的一致性。方法:作为一项基于人群的横断面研究的一部分,连续913名40岁及40岁以上的中国受试者在瞳孔散大后接受了ONH的HRT-3和HD-OCT成像。计算来自Bland-Altman分析的一致性极限(LOA)以进行ONH测量。结果:研究参与者的平均年龄(±SD)为54.2±7.2岁,男性为52.0%。两种仪器的平均视盘面积测量结果无差异(HD-OCT为1.98±0.37 mm,HRT-3为1.98±0.39 mm,p = 0.95)。 HD-OCT的轮辋面积较小(1.29±0.24 vs 1.46±0.27 mm,p <0.001),但与杯相关的参数(对于所有p <0.001)都比HRT-3大。仪器之间的最大相关性是杯体积(r 2 = 0.74,p <0.001)和椎间盘面积(r 2 = 0.62,p <0.001)。杯碟比(CDR),垂直CDR和边缘区域的相关性较低(r 2分别为0.59、0.48和0.24,所有p均<0.001)。 BlandeAltman图显示了所有ONH参数差异的显着比例偏差(所有p <0.01),与盘相关的参数(0.98-1.0)的LOA大于与杯相关的参数(0.26-0.50)。结论在ONH测量中,HRT-3和HD-OCT之间存在实质性分歧。尽管光盘面积测量相似,但与HRT-3相比,HD-OCT低估了轮缘区域,并高估了杯形参数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号