...
首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Epidemiology: Official Journal of the International Epidemiological Association >Commentary: decreasing response rates require investigators to quantify and report the impact of selection bias in case-control studies.
【24h】

Commentary: decreasing response rates require investigators to quantify and report the impact of selection bias in case-control studies.

机译:评论:降低回应率要求研究者量化和报告选择偏倚在病例对照研究中的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

A high response rate has long been regarded as one of the hallmarks of a 'good' epidemiological study. However, the validity of results from studies that require participants to complete questionnaires, have an interview or provide a biological specimen is becoming increasingly jeopardized by decreasing participation. One analysis showed that cooperation rates (participants interviewedumber eligible that were contacted) in published population-based case-control studies declined by 3.33% per year in cases and 5.15% per year in controls from 1991 to 2003.
机译:长期以来,高响应率一直被视为“良好”流行病学研究的标志之一。但是,要求参加者完成问卷,进行访谈或提供生物学标本的研究结果的有效性正因参与程度的降低而越来越受到损害。一项分析表明,从1991年至2003年,已发表的基于人群的病例对照研究中的合作率(受访者参与人数/接触的合格人数)每年下降3.33%,而对照每年下降5.15%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号