...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Understanding the debate around regulation of support workers.
【24h】

Understanding the debate around regulation of support workers.

机译:了解有关支持人员监管的辩论。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

While much is written about the regulation of healthcare support workers (HCSWs), many authors and policy makers do not distinguish between assumption and evidence. As calls for compulsory regulation of HCSWs grow louder, it is crucial that the evidence underpinning the debate on both sides is considered carefully and critically. The authors reviewed journal articles and policy documents with the specific aim of clarifying the arguments for and against further regulation from an evidence-based perspective. The majority of material recommended HCSW regulation, however, the mechanisms by which regulation would deliver better patient care were often missing and were rarely evidence-based. This article provides clear definitions of the key terms and processes needed to engage in the debate, followed by a summary of the arguments for and against the regulation of support workers.
机译:尽管有关卫生保健支持人员(HCSW)的法规的文章很多,但许多作者和决策者并未区分假设和证据。随着对强制性高等级SWSW的强制性监管的呼声越来越高,至关重要的是,认真而严格地考虑支持双方辩论的证据。作者审阅了期刊文章和政策文件,其特定目的是从基于证据的角度澄清支持和反对进一步监管的论点。大多数材料建议采用HCSW法规,但是,法规提供更好的患者护理的机制常常缺失,而且很少基于证据。本文为参与辩论所需的关键术语和过程提供了清晰的定义,然后总结了支持人员和支持人员的监管的论点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号