...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of nursing: BJN >Literature review: should nursing take aromatherapy more seriously?
【24h】

Literature review: should nursing take aromatherapy more seriously?

机译:文献综述:护理人员应更认真地进行芳香疗法吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Aromatherapy is often misunderstood and consequently somewhat marginalized. Because of a basic misinterpretation, the integration of aromatherapy into UK hospitals is not moving forward as quickly as it might. Aromatherapy in UK is primarily aimed at enhancing patient care or improving patient satisfaction, and it is frequently mixed with massage. Little focus is given to the real clinical potential, except for a few pockets such as the Micap/South Manchester University initiative which led to a Phase 1 clinical trial into the effects of aromatherapy on infection carried out in the Burns Unit of Wythenshawe Hospital. This article discusses the expansion of aromatherapy within the US and follows 10 years of developing protocols and policies that led to pilot studies on radiation burns, chemo-induced nausea, slow-healing wounds, Alzheimers and end-of-life agitation. The article poses two questions: should nursing take aromatherapy more seriously and do nurses really need 60 hours of massage to use aromatherapy as part of nursing practice?
机译:芳香疗法常常被误解,因此被边缘化了。由于基本的误解,香薰疗法在英国医院中的整合并没有以最快的速度发展。英国的香薰疗法主要旨在增强患者护理或改善患者满意度,并且经常与按摩混合使用。除了少数方面,如Micap /南曼彻斯特大学计划,该计划导致了对Wythenshawe医院Burns部门进行的芳香疗法对感染的影响的1期临床试验,因此很少关注真正的临床潜力。本文讨论了芳香疗法在美国的扩展,并遵循了10年的开发方案和政策,从而进行了有关放射性烧伤,化学引起的恶心,伤口愈合缓慢,阿尔茨海默氏病和临终期躁动的先导研究。文章提出了两个问题:护理人员应该更认真地对待芳香疗法吗?护士是否真的需要60小时的按摩才能将芳香疗法用作护理实践的一部分?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号