An ethical analysis of the precautionary principle

摘要

The debate over the precautionary principle is intimately linked with values and worldviews. I examine how diverging conceptions of 'the good world' affect the conceptualisation of the precautionary principle. Three complementary conceptualisations emerge: 1 a call for a change in attitude, 2 a prescription for formalistic action and 3 guidance for contextual action. I apply these conceptualisations to two extreme forms of implementations, a minimal and maximum change approach. I conclude by conducting risk evaluations of the second order: What are the risks of implementing the precautionary principle into risk evaluation?