...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics >TCI remifentanil vs. TCI propofol for awake fiber-optic intubation with limited topical anesthesia.
【24h】

TCI remifentanil vs. TCI propofol for awake fiber-optic intubation with limited topical anesthesia.

机译:TCI瑞芬太尼与TCI异丙酚用于清醒的光纤插管,局部麻醉有限。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of propofol and remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) on awake fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia. 36 patients requiring fiberoptic intubation were randomized to receive propofol (P) or remifentanil (R) effect-site TCI. Target concentrations, sedation levels, pulse oximetry, hemodynamic change, duration, number of adjustments, intubating conditions and recall after surgery were recorded at each stage. The results showed that the target intubation concentration of remifentanil was very close to the sedation concentration but that the intubation concentration of propofol was more than double its sedation concentration (5.83+/-1.46 mug/ml vs. 2.60+/-0.47 mug/ml, respectively). Vocal cord opening was significantly better in remifentanil-treated patients. More adjustments and a longer duration were required in propofol-treated patients. Recall was significantly more frequent in remifentanil-treated patients. We concluded that compared to TCI propofol, TCI remifentanil can provide safer and better intubating conditions for fiber-optic intubation with limited local anesthesia.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较异丙酚和瑞芬太尼靶控输注(TCI)在局麻受限的清醒光纤插管中的作用。 36名需要进行光纤插管的患者被随机分配接受丙泊酚(P)或瑞芬太尼(R)效应部位TCI。在每个阶段记录目标浓度,镇静水平,脉搏血氧饱和度,血液动力学变化,持续时间,调整次数,插管情况和术后召回率。结果表明瑞芬太尼的目标插管浓度与镇静浓度非常接近,但丙泊酚的插管浓度是其镇静浓度的两倍以上(5.83 +/- 1.46杯/毫升对2.60 +/- 0.47杯/毫升, 分别)。瑞芬太尼治疗的患者的声带张开明显更好。异丙酚治疗的患者需要更多的调整和更长的持续时间。瑞芬太尼治疗的患者的召回率明显更高。我们得出的结论是,与TCI丙泊酚相比,TCI瑞芬太尼可为局麻受限的光纤插管提供更安全,更好的插管条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号