...
首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics >Midazolam 12 mg is moderately counteracted by 250 mg caffeine in man.
【24h】

Midazolam 12 mg is moderately counteracted by 250 mg caffeine in man.

机译:咪达唑仑12 mg在人体内被250 mg咖啡因适度抵消。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Caffeine (Caf) counteracts various effects of benzodiazepines (BZDs). Since the effects of zolpidem, a short-acting atypical GABA(A)-BZD agonist, were not antagonized by Caf, we studied an interaction between Caf and midazolam (Mid) in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS AND METHODS: In Study 1, 108 healthy students divided to 6 parallel groups were given Mid 12 mg (capsule) and Caf 125 and 250 mg (in decaffeinated coffee), alone and in combinations in the double-blind placebo-controlled manner. Objective and subjective tests were done before and at 45 and 90 min after intake. Ranked delta-values (changes from baseline) were analyzed by one-way contrast ANOVA and Scheffe's tests. In Study 2, six healthy subjects took Mid 15 mg (tablet) with and without Caf 300 mg. The dynamic effects were analyzed as in Study 1 and the plasma concentrations were assayed. RESULTS: In Study 1, learn effects after placebo (ad + 15%) were seen for letter cancellation and digit symbol substitution tests. Midazolam alone significantly (p < 0.05 vs. delta-placebo) reduced letter cancellation and digit symbol substitution, lowered flicker fusion, impaired digit learning and caused subjective calmness on VAS. Caffeine alone did not differ from placebo objectively, yet improved quick-wittedness and contentedness on VAS. In the combinations, Mid + Caf 125 mg differed from placebo objectively as Mid alone, whereas Mid + Caf 250 mg did not. Mid + Caf 250 mg differed from Mid on digit substitution, but did not differ from Mid+Caf 150 mg in impairing memory and causing subjective sedation. In Study 2, Mid 15 mg caused sedation and Caf 300 mg increased plasma Mid at 45 min. Mid + Caf did not differ from Mid alone objectively, but did so subjectively on VAS (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in a parallel group study, sedative effects of Mid 12 mg were only moderately antagonized by Caf 250 mg but not by Caf 125 mg. In a cross-over study, a weak interaction was found subjectively but not in objective measures.
机译:目的:咖啡因(Cafine)可抵消苯二氮卓(BZDs)的多种作用。由于Zafpidem(一种短效非典型GABA(A)-BZD激动剂)的作用并未被Caf拮抗,因此我们在健康志愿者中研究了Caf与咪达唑仑(Mid)之间的相互作用。受试者,材料和方法:在研究1中,将108个健康学生分为6个平行组,分别服用中度12 mg(胶囊)和Caf 125和250 mg(不含咖啡因的咖啡),并以双盲安慰剂对照进行组合方式。摄入前后45分钟和90分钟进行客观和主观测试。通过单向对比方差分析和Scheffe检验分析排名的增量值(与基线相比的变化)。在研究2中,六名健康受试者在服用和不服用300毫克Caf的情况下服用了15毫克(片剂)的中毒。如研究1中那样分析动力学效应并测定血浆浓度。结果:在研究1中,对于字母取消和数字符号替换测试,观察到安慰剂(广告+ 15%)后的学习效果。单独使用咪达唑仑(p <0.05 vs. delta-安慰剂)可减少字母取消和数字符号替换,降低闪烁融合,损害数字学习,并引起VAS的主观平静。单独的咖啡因与客观安慰剂没有什么区别,但是改善了VAS的机智和满足感。在组合中,Mid + Caf 125 mg与安慰剂在客观上与Mid单独不同,而Mid + Caf 250 mg没有。 Mid + Caf 250 mg与手指替代Mid有所不同,但与Mid + Caf 150 mg在损害记忆力和引起主观镇静方面没有差异。在研究2中,中度15毫克引起镇静作用,咖啡因300毫克在45分钟时增加血浆中度浓度。 Mid + Caf在客观上与Mid并没有不同,但是在VAS上主观上没有差异(p> 0.05)。结论:总之,在平行组研究中,中度12 mg的镇静作用仅被250毫克Caf适度拮抗,而125毫克Caf则没有。在一项交叉研究中,主观上发现了较弱的交互作用,而在客观测量中则没有。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号