首页> 外文期刊>International journal of clinical practice >The safety and efficacy of formoterol (Oxis) turbuhaler plus budesonide (Pulmicort) turbuhaler in mild to moderate asthma: a comparison with budesonide Turbuhaler alone and current non-corticosteroid therapy in Russia.
【24h】

The safety and efficacy of formoterol (Oxis) turbuhaler plus budesonide (Pulmicort) turbuhaler in mild to moderate asthma: a comparison with budesonide Turbuhaler alone and current non-corticosteroid therapy in Russia.

机译:福莫特罗(Oxis)turbuhaler联合布地奈德(Pulmicort)turbuhaler在轻度至中度哮喘中的安全性和有效性:与单独使用布地奈德turbuhaler以及俄罗斯目前的非皮质类固醇疗法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Current therapy in Russia for long-term management of asthma is mainly non-steroidal. This provided the opportunity to compare the efficacy and safety of formoterol (Oxis) Turbuhaler plus budesonide (Pulmicort) Turbuhaler with budesonide Turbuhaler alone in adults (n=338) with mild to moderate asthma who had little previous exposure to inhaled corticosteroids. The 12-week study followed a randomised, double-blind, parallel group design and included an open control group of patients who were treated with conventional non-corticosteroid therapy. Patients treated with formoterol plus budesonide benefited from a significantly greater improvement in their pulmonary function and asthma symptoms compared with budesonide alone (95% Cl of difference in mean morning peak expiratory flow [PEF] 8.7-36.3 l/min, p=0.0015). Non-corticosteroid treatment was significantly less effective than formoterol plus budesonide and budesonide alone (95% CIs of differences in mean morning PEF were 36.4-63.6 l/min and 14.1-41.1 l/min, respectively, both p=0.0001). Although the incidence and frequency of adverse events was not significantly different between the groups, formoterol plus budesonide and budesonide alone were better tolerated than non-corticosteroid treatment, and there were fewer incidences of asthma deterioration. Overall, formoterol Turbuhaler plus budesonide Turbuhaler was the safest and most effective treatment.
机译:俄罗斯目前用于哮喘长期治疗的疗法主要是非甾体治疗。这提供了机会来比较福莫特罗(Oxis)Turbuhaler加布地奈德(Pulmicort)Turbuhaler与布地奈德Turbuhaler在成人(n = 338)轻度至中度哮喘患者之间的安全性和安全性,他们以前很少接触吸入糖皮质激素。这项为期12周的研究遵循随机,双盲,平行组设计,并纳入了接受常规非皮质类固醇治疗的开放对照组。与单用布地奈德相比,福莫特罗加布地奈德治疗的患者的肺功能和哮喘症状明显改善(平均早晨峰值呼气流量[PEF]差异为95%Cl [PEF] 8.7-36.3 l / min,p = 0.0015)。非皮质类固醇激素治疗的疗效显着低于福莫特罗加布地奈德和布地奈德(平均早晨PEF差异的95%CI分别为36.4-63.6 l / min和14.1-41.1 l / min,均p = 0.0001)。尽管两组之间不良事件的发生率和发生频率没有显着差异,但福莫特罗加布地奈德和布地奈德的耐受性比非皮质类固醇治疗更好,哮喘恶化的发生率也更低。总体而言,福莫特罗Turbuhaler加布地奈德Turbuhaler是最安全,最有效的治疗方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号