首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management >Stakeholders' expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity. (Special Issue: Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services.)
【24h】

Stakeholders' expectations on ecosystem services affect the assessment of ecosystem services hotspots and their congruence with biodiversity. (Special Issue: Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services.)

机译:利益相关者对生态系统服务的期望会影响对生态系统服务热点的评估及其与生物多样性的一致性。 (特刊:量化和绘制生态系统服务图。)

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The congruence of ecosystem services (ESs) and the congruence of ES 'hotspots' and 'hotspots' of biodiversity are receiving growing interest. The thresholds used in such analyses to assess the ES presence vary widely but their effects have not been questioned. We provide an analysis of the effect of the choice of these thresholds on the overlap among ESs and the distribution of hotspots. Focusing on grasslands from the Central French Alps, we first systematically varied thresholds for three ESs (agronomic, regulation and aesthetic values), then considered triplets of thresholds representing three contrasted stakeholder perspectives on the importance of each of these services. Overlap between ESs depended strongly on thresholds. The extent of ES hotspots and their overlap with biodiversity hotspots varied widely across perspectives. Coldspots never overlapped with areas of interest for biodiversity, whatever be the perspective. Overlap was less informative than the diagnostic test of the capacity of individual ESs to capture each other's distribution. Agronomic value poorly captured other ESs. Biodiversity was well captured by regulation and aesthetic values, but poorly captured by service hotspots. This analysis emphasizes the importance of accounting for varying stakeholders' expectations in ES hotspot assessments.
机译:生态系统服务(ESs)的一致性以及生物多样性的ES“热点”和“热点”的一致性正在受到越来越多的关注。在此类分析中用于评估ES存在的阈值差异很大,但其作用尚未受到质疑。我们提供了这些阈值的选择对ES之间的重叠和热点分布的影响的分析。我们着眼于法国中部阿尔卑斯山的草原,首先系统地改变了三个生态系统的阈值(农艺,法规和美学价值),然后考虑了阈值的三元组,代表了三种不同利益相关者对每种服务重要性的看法。 ES之间的重叠在很大程度上取决于阈值。 ES热点的程度及其与生物多样性热点的重叠在各个角度上差异很大。无论从哪个角度来看,寒区永远不会与生物多样性感兴趣的领域重叠。重叠性比诊断单个ES捕获彼此分布的能力的信息要少。农艺价值很难捕捉到其他ES。法规和美学价值很好地抓住了生物多样性,而服务热点却很难抓住生物多样性。该分析强调了在ES热点评估中考虑不同利益相关者期望的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号