...
首页> 外文期刊>International clinical psychopharmacology >Comparison of ziprasidone and aripiprazole in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, 4-week study.
【24h】

Comparison of ziprasidone and aripiprazole in acutely ill patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder: a randomized, double-blind, 4-week study.

机译:齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑在患有精神分裂症或精神分裂症的急性病患者中的比较:一项随机,双盲,为期4周的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

We compared the efficacy and safety of ziprasidone and aripiprazole in the treatment of acutely ill patients with schizophrenia. Patients were randomized to receive double-blind treatment with ziprasidone (80-160 mg/day), or aripiprazole (10-30 mg/day) for up to 4 weeks. Primary efficacy measures were the Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale (CGI-S) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRSd) total (derived from the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale). Noninferiority for ziprasidone (N=125) relative to aripiprazole (N=128) was established for CGI-S score (P=0.007), but was not confirmed for BPRSd total score (P=0.248). Effect sizes for within-group improvement, however, were robust for both ziprasidone and aripiprazole (effect size range 1.0-1.1 for CGI-S; and range 1.1-1.2 for BPRSd total). A mixed model repeated measures analysis of BPRSd total score favored ziprasidone at day 4 compared with aripiprazole (P=0.04), with no significant differences between treatment groups at other visits (P=0.001 for interaction between treatment and visit). No statistically significant difference was found in CGI-S score between groups across all visits. Our findings suggest that ziprasidone and aripiprazole exhibit similar efficacy and tolerability profiles in the treatment of acute schizophrenia. Differences between the two drugs in the onset of therapeutic effect warrant further investigation.
机译:我们比较了齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑在急性精神分裂症患者中的疗效和安全性。患者随机接受齐拉西酮(80-160 mg /天)或阿立哌唑(10-30 mg /天)双盲治疗,最多4周。主要疗效指标是临床总体严重程度印象量表(CGI-S)和总简要精神病评定量表(BPRSd)(来自阳性和阴性综合征量表)。相对于阿立哌唑(N = 128)而言,齐拉西酮(N = 125)的非劣效性建立在CGI-S评分(P = 0.007)上,但并未证实BPRSd总评分(P = 0.248)。但是,对于齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑,组内改善的作用大小均很强(CGI-S的作用大小范围为1.0-1.1; BPRSd的作用大小范围为1.1-1.2)。与阿立哌唑相比,第4天对BPRSd总评分的混合模型重复测量分析偏爱齐拉西酮(P = 0.04),其他访视的治疗组之间无显着差异(治疗与访视之间的相互作用为P = 0.001)。在所有访问中,各组之间的CGI-S得分均未发现统计学上的显着差异。我们的发现表明,齐拉西酮和阿立哌唑在急性精神分裂症的治疗中具有相似的疗效和耐受性。两种药物在起效方面的差异值得进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号