首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Automotive Technology >EFFECTIVENESS OF ECE R66 AND FMVSS 220 STANDARDS IN ROLLOVER CRASHWORTHINESS ASSESSMENT OF PARATRANSIT BUSES
【24h】

EFFECTIVENESS OF ECE R66 AND FMVSS 220 STANDARDS IN ROLLOVER CRASHWORTHINESS ASSESSMENT OF PARATRANSIT BUSES

机译:ECE R66和FMVSS 220标准在跨界客车交叉现金价值评估中的有效性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The main objective of the presented study was to compare the effectiveness of two standard test procedures for evaluating bus roof integrity: the dynamic rollover test according to UN-ECE Regulation 66 (ECE-R66), and the quasi-static symmetric roof loading according the Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard 220 (FMVSS 220). Both tests were applied to a selected Paratransit Bus. The investigation was carried out primarily using a numerical study backed up by experimental validation tests on components and full scale rollover tests. A sensitivity analysis using LS-OPT was performed to identify the most important structural components influencing the response of the bus in these two tests. The results obtained from this study show that the final outcome of the crashworthiness assessment of the selected paratransit bus depends on the selection of the evaluation standard. Although the two tests are used for the same purpose of roof integrity evaluation, their results are divergent and may lead to different conclusions. The paper presents a discussion on the effectiveness of both standards in evaluating the rollover crashworthiness.
机译:本研究的主要目的是比较两种用于评估公交车顶板完整性的标准测试程序的有效性:根据UN-ECE法规66(ECE-R66)进行的动态侧翻测试,以及根据标准的准静态对称顶板载荷进行的测试。联邦机动车辆安全标准220(FMVSS 220)。两项测试均应用于选定的辅助公交车。该调查主要是通过数值研究进行的,该数值研究以对组件的实验验证测试和满量程翻转测试为后盾。在这两个测试中,使用LS-OPT进行了灵敏度分析,以确定影响总线响应的最重要的结构组件。从这项研究中获得的结果表明,对选定的公交车辆的耐撞性评估的最终结果取决于评估标准的选择。尽管这两个测试用于屋顶完整性评估的相同目的,但它们的结果是不同的,可能得出不同的结论。本文对两种标准在评估侧翻防撞性方面的有效性进行了讨论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号