首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Evaluation of the validity and reliability of A-scan ultrasound biometry with a single use disposable cover.
【24h】

Evaluation of the validity and reliability of A-scan ultrasound biometry with a single use disposable cover.

机译:一次性使用一次性覆盖物评估A扫描超声生物测定法的有效性和可靠性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

BACKGROUND: The UK Medical Devices Agency has suggested that ophthalmic practitioners should, where practicable and not compromising clinical outcome, restrict corneal contact devices to single patient use to minimise a remote theoretical risk of transmission of new variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD). This study reports on a modified technique of ultrasound A-scan biometry that complies with the MDA recommendations. METHODS: The right eyes of 37 consecutive hospital patients had a series of biometry readings taken with a Humphrey 820 A-scan instrument with a plane wave transducer use d conventionally and with the addition of a disposable latex cover. RESULTS: Intrasessional repeatability of axial length measurements was similar for conventional readings--mean difference 0.027 mm, 95% confidence intervals (CI) +/- 0.44 mm and those taken with a disposable cover (0.028 mm, CI +/- 0.38). Intersessional repeatability was equivalent with (0.002 mm, CI +.- 0.51) and without a cover (0.03 mm, CI +/- 0.51). Readings with a cover were not significantly different from those without (paired t test; p >0.05), but tended to be greater (mean difference 0.085 mm, CI +/- 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that corneal contact biometry with a disposable cover is a viable and theoretically safer alternative to the conventional technique.
机译:背景:英国医疗器械局(UK Medical Devices Agency)提出,眼科医生应在可行且不影响临床结局的情况下,将角膜接触器械限制在单人使用,以最大程度地减少新的克雅氏病(vCJD)传播的理论远期风险。这项研究报告了一种符合MDA建议的改进的超声A扫描生物测定技术。方法:连续37例住院患者的右眼使用Humphrey 820 A扫描仪和常规使用的平面波换能器并加上一次性乳胶罩采集一系列生物特征读数。结果:轴向长度测量的术中可重复性与常规读数相似-平均差0.027 mm,95%置信区间(CI)+/- 0.44 mm和使用一次性覆盖物(0.028 mm,CI +/- 0.38)进行测量。闭会期间重复性等效于(0.002 mm,CI + .- 0.51),无覆盖物(0.03 mm,CI +/- 0.51)。带盖的读数与不带盖的读数无显着差异(配对t检验; p> 0.05),但倾向于更大(均差0.085 mm,CI +/- 0.60)。结论:这些发现表明,使用一次性覆盖物进行角膜接触生物测定是传统技术的可行且理论上更安全的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号