首页> 外文期刊>British journal of ophthalmology >Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes
【24h】

Direct comparison of spectral-domain and swept-source OCT in the measurement of choroidal thickness in normal eyes

机译:光谱域和扫频OCT在正常眼睛脉络膜厚度测量中的直接比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objective: To compare spectral-domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept-source OCT (SS-OCT) in the study of choroidal thickness (CT) in healthy eyes. Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional, single-centre study. 82 healthy eyes of 46 patients were included. In a single session, Topcon 3D-2000 SD-OCT and 1050 nm SS-OCT prototype devices were used to perform OCT scans using a single line protocol. Two masked investigators independently, manually determined 13 CT measurements consisting of one subfoveal (SFCT), and six measurements on either side of the fovea (nasal and temporal) taken every 500 microns apart. The mean CT (MCT) was the mean average of these 13 measurements. Results: SD-OCT was able to reproducibly measure the CT in 74.4% of eyes vs 100% with SS-OCT (p<0.05; Fisher's Exact test). In those eyes measured by both systems, mean SFCT was 279.4±96.9 μm (range, 84-506) with SD-OCT vs 285.7±88.9 μm (range 130-527) with SS-OCT (p=0.11; Student's t test paired data). Mean MCT was 243.8±78.8 μm (range 103.6-433.2) with SD-OCT vs 242.2±81.8 μm (range 97.6-459) with SS-OCT (p=0.64; Student's t test paired data). The difference in SFCT and MCT was not statistically significant between both devices. Intraclass correlation coefficient was higher than 0.9 interobserver and interdevice measurements. SFCT Bland-Altman plots showed 95% interobserver measurement agreement within ±34 for SD-OCT, ±22 for SS-OCT and ±60 μm intersystems. Conclusions: SS-OCT permitted accurate identification of the choroido-scleral border in 100% of normal eyes, suggesting that SS-OCT was the superior modality for the measurement of CT.
机译:目的:比较光谱域光学相干断层扫描(SD-OCT)和扫频OCT(SS-OCT)在研究健康眼睛的脉络膜厚度(CT)方面。方法:前瞻性,横断面,单中心研究。纳入了46例患者的82只健康眼睛。在单个会话中,使用Topcon 3D-2000 SD-OCT和1050 nm SS-OCT原型设备使用单线协议执行OCT扫描。两名独立的被掩盖的研究人员手动确定13个CT测量值,包括一个小凹下(SFCT),以及每500微米相隔一次在小凹的两侧(鼻和颞)进行六次测量。平均CT(MCT)是这13次测量的平均值。结果:SD-OCT能够重现性地测量74.4%的眼睛的CT,而SS-OCT能够测量100%的CT(p <0.05; Fisher精确检验)。在两个系统中测量的那些眼睛中,SD-OCT的平均SFCT为279.4±96.9μm(范围84-506),SS-OCT的平均SFCT为285.7±88.9μm(范围130-527)(p = 0.11; Student's t检验配对)数据)。 SD-OCT的平均MCT为243.8±78.8μm(范围103.6-433.2),SS-OCT的平均MCT为242.2±81.8μm(范围97.6-459)(p = 0.64; Student's t检验配对数据)。两种设备之间SFCT和MCT的差异无统计学意义。类内相关系数高于0.9的观察者间和设备间测量值。 SFCT Bland-Altman图显示SD-OCT的观察者间测量一致性为95%,在±34之内,SS-OCT的观察者之间为±22,系统间的误差为±60μm。结论:SS-OCT可以准确识别100%正常眼睛的脉络膜-巩膜边界,这表明SS-OCT是CT测量的最佳方式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号