首页> 外文期刊>International dental journal >Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth
【24h】

Comparison of laser fluorescence devices for detection of caries in primary teeth

机译:激光荧光设备检测乳牙龋齿的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The aim of this in vivo study was to evaluate the performance of fluorescence-based devices in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary molars compared with conventional methods. Two examiners assessed 44 occlusal surfaces of first and second primary molars in 20 patients using two fluorescence devices: DIAGNOdent (LF) and DIAGNOdent pen (LFpen). Teeth were also assessed by visual examination and bitewing radiograph. Histological examination served as the gold standard after extraction. By using the McNemar test, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating curve were calculated as outer enamel (D1), inner enamel (D2) and dentine caries (D3) lesion thresholds. The intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility were calculated using the Cohen's unweighted kappa statistics. At the D1 threshold, the LFpen sensitivity was statistically higher than LF and radiographic examination (P < 0.001), whereas there was no statistically significant difference among the groups at the D2 and D3 thresholds (P > 0.05). All methods demonstrated the highest sensitivity values at D3. At the D1 and D2 thresholds, there were no significant differences between the LFpen specificity and the other methods. All methods presented similar performance in detecting all lesions considering the area under the receiver operating curve. The LFpen showed better performance than LF. Furthermore, visual examination and the LFpen device seem to be sufficient for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars.
机译:这项体内研究的目的是评估与传统方法相比,基于荧光的设备在检测原发磨牙中的咬合龋病变中的性能。两名检查员使用两种荧光设备:DIAGNOdent(LF)和DIAGNOdent pen(LFpen)评估了20位患者的第一和第二主磨牙的44个咬合面。还通过目测和咬合射线照相术评估了牙齿。提取后,组织学检查是金标准。通过使用McNemar测试,灵敏度,特异性,准确性和接受者操作曲线下的面积被计算为外牙釉质(D1),内牙釉质(D2)和牙本质龋(D3)损伤阈值。使用Cohen的未加权kappa统计量计算内部和内部检验者的可重复性。在D1阈值时,LFpen敏感性在统计学上高于LF和X线检查(P <0.001),而在D2和D3阈值时各组之间无统计学差异(P> 0.05)。所有方法均在D3处显示出最高的灵敏度值。在D1和D2阈值下,LFpen特异性与其他方法之间没有显着差异。考虑到接收器工作曲线下的面积,所有方法在检测所有病变方面均表现出相似的性能。 LFpen显示出比LF更好的性能。此外,目测和LFpen装置似乎足以检测原发磨牙中的咬合龋。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号