首页> 外文期刊>International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids >Performance analysis of IDEAL algorithm for three-dimensional incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems
【24h】

Performance analysis of IDEAL algorithm for three-dimensional incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems

机译:三维不可压缩流体流动和传热问题的IDEAL算法性能分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Recently, an efficient segregated algorithm for incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems, called inner doubly iterative efficient algorithm for linked equations (IDEAL), has been proposed by the present authors. In the algorithm there exist inner doubly iterative processes for pressure equation at each iteration level, which almost completely overcome two approximations in SIMPLE algorithm. Thus, the coupling between velocity and pressure is fully guaranteed, greatly enhancing the convergence rate and stability of solution process. However, validations have only been conducted for two-dimensional cases. In the present paper the performance of the IDEAL algorithm for three-dimensional incompressible fluid flow and heat transfer problems is analyzed and a systemic comparison is made between the algorithm and three other most widely used algorithms (SIMPLER, SIMPLEC and PISO). By the comparison of five application examples, it is found that the IDEAL algorithm is the most robust and the most efficient one among the four algorithms compared. For the five three-dimensional cases studied, when each algorithm works at its own optimal under-relaxation factor, the IDEAL algorithm can reduce the computation time by 12.9-52.7% over SIMPLER algorithm, by 45.3-73.4% over SIMPLEC algorithm and by 10.7-53.1% over PISO algorithm.
机译:最近,本作者提出了一种针对不可压缩流体流动和传热问题的有效隔离算法,称为内联方程的内部双重迭代高效算法(IDEAL)。该算法在每个迭代级别都存在压力方程的内部双重迭代过程,几乎完全克服了SIMPLE算法中的两个近似。这样,充分保证了速度和压力之间的耦合,大大提高了求解过程的收敛速度和稳定性。但是,仅对二维情况进行了验证。在本文中,分析了IDEAL算法在三维不可压缩流体流动和传热问题上的性能,并对该算法与其他三种最广泛使用的算法(SIMPLER,SIMPLEC和PISO)进行了系统比较。通过对五个应用示例的比较,发现IDEAL算法是四种算法中最健壮,最高效的一种。对于所研究的五个三维情况,当每种算法以其自身的最佳欠松弛因子工作时,IDEAL算法的计算时间比SIMPLER算法减少12.9-52.7%,比SIMPLEC算法减少45.3-73.4%,并且减少10.7胜过PISO算法的-53.1%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号