首页> 外文期刊>Zeitschrift fuer pflanzenernaehrung und bodenkunde >A comparison of methods for soil microbial population and biomass studies
【24h】

A comparison of methods for soil microbial population and biomass studies

机译:土壤微生物种群和生物量研究方法的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractA comparison was made of 15 different techniques which are used in assessing soil microbial populations and/or biomasses. These include direct observations (fungal standing crop, fluorescein diacetate active mycelia, acridine orange stained bacteria), cultural methods (bacterial plate counts), physiological methods (total microbial, bacterial and fungal biomasses, O2‐uptake), soil enzyme analyses (dehydrogenase, catalase, alkaline and acid phosphatase, protease, amylase), and ATP‐analyses.The various techniques were applied to six soils known to have different microbial characteristics. The results are discussed with respect to the convertability of counts and measurements into microbial biomasses, the variability of the techniques, the correlations within comparable groups of methods, and the practical limitations in application of individual methods to different so
机译:摘要对15种用于评估土壤微生物种群和/或生物量的不同技术进行了比较。这些包括直接观察(真菌站立作物、荧光素二乙酸活性菌丝体、吖啶橙染色细菌)、培养方法(细菌平板计数)、生理方法(总微生物、细菌和真菌生物量、O2 摄取)、土壤酶分析(脱氢酶、过氧化氢酶、碱性和酸性磷酸酶、蛋白酶、淀粉酶)和 ATP 分析。各种技术被应用于已知具有不同微生物特征的六种土壤。讨论了计数和测量值转换为微生物生物量的可转换性、技术的可变性、可比方法组内的相关性以及将单个方法应用于不同微生物生物量的实际局限性。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号