首页> 外文期刊>neurourology and urodynamics >Diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence—a comparison of the fluid bridge (flow) test and a pressure test
【24h】

Diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence—a comparison of the fluid bridge (flow) test and a pressure test

机译:真正的压力性尿失禁的诊断——液桥(流动)试验和压力试验的比较

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

AbstractTwo urodynamic investigations designed to make a diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence were compared in 103 women complaining of stress incontinence and 19 continent women. A fluid bridge (flow) test and a stress urethral pressure profile (using a microtip catheter system) were performed. Both tests gave similar results, confirming the diagnosis in 90 of the incontinent group.
机译:摘要 对103例主诉压力性尿失禁的女性和19例大陆女性进行了两项尿动力学研究,旨在诊断真正的压力性尿失禁。进行了液桥(流动)测试和压力尿道压力曲线(使用微尖导尿管系统)。两项检查都给出了相似的结果,证实了 90% 的失禁组的诊断。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号