首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Agronomy >Environmentally Smart Nitrogen Performance in Northern Great Plains' Spring Wheat Production Systems
【24h】

Environmentally Smart Nitrogen Performance in Northern Great Plains' Spring Wheat Production Systems

机译:大平原北部春小麦生产系统中的环保型氮素表现

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Experiments were conducted in Montana to evaluate Environmentally Smart Nitrogen (ESN) as a nitrogen (N) source in wheat. Plots were arranged in a split-plot design with ESN, urea, and a 50%-50% urea-ESN blend at low, medium, and high at-seeding N rates in the subplot, with four replications. Measurements included grain yield (GY), protein (GP), and N uptake (GNU). A partial budget economic analysis was performed to assess the net benefits of the three sources. Average GY varied from 1816 to 5583 kgha"1 and grain protein (GP) content ranged from 9.1 to 17.3% among site-years. Urea, ESN, and the blend resulted in higher GYs at 3, 2, and 2 site-years out of 8 evaluated site-years, respectively. Topdressing N improved GY for all sources. No trend in GP associated with N source was observed. With GP-adjusted revenue, farmer would not recover investment costs from ESN or blend compared with urea. With ESN costing consistently more than urea per unit of N, we recommend urea as N source for spring wheatin Northern Great Plains.
机译:在蒙大拿州进行了试验,以评估环境智能氮(ESN)作为小麦中的氮(N)源。在ESP,尿素和50%-50%尿素-ESN共混物的分裂图设计中,在子图中以低,中和高播种N速率布置,重复四次。测量包括谷物产量(GY),蛋白质(GP)和氮吸收(GNU)。进行了部分预算经济分析,以评估这三个来源的净收益。平均GY在1816到5583 kgha“ 1之间,谷物蛋白(GP)含量在站点年之间介于9.1%和17.3%之间。尿素,ESN和混合物导致在第3、2和2个站点年的GY较高。分别在8个评估站点年中,追肥N改善了所有来源的GY;未观察到与N来源相关的GP趋势; GP调整收入后,与尿素相比,农民无法从ESN或混合肥料中收回投资成本。每单位N的成本始终高于尿素,我们建议在北大平原北部将尿素用作春季小麦的氮源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号