首页> 外文期刊>British journal of sports medicine >Preparticipation medical evaluation in professional sport in the UK: theory or practice?
【24h】

Preparticipation medical evaluation in professional sport in the UK: theory or practice?

机译:英国专业运动的参与前医学评估:理论还是实践?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

OBJECTIVE: To determine the level of pre-employment, pre-season, and post-injury medical evaluation of players undertaken within UK professional team sports. DESIGN: A postal, whole population survey. SETTING: Elite professional sports teams in England. POPULATION: Six groups comprising the following clubs: professional football (Premiership, 15 of 20; Championship, 22 of 24), rugby union (Premiership, 9 of 12; Division 1, 11 of 14), rugby league (Super League, 6 of 11) and cricket (County, 12 of 18). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number (percentage) of clubs recording players' medical history and undertaking medical examinations of players' cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems at pre-employment, pre-season and post-injury. RESULTS: The overall response to the survey was 74%, with a range from 55% to 92% among groups. Almost 90% of football (Premiership and Championship) and rugby union (Premiership) clubs took a pre-employment history of players' general health, cardiovascular, respiratory, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems, but fewer than 50% of cricket and rugby union (Division 1) clubs recorded a history. The majority of football (Premiership and Championship) and rugby union (Premiership) clubs implemented both cardiovascular and musculoskeletal examinations of players before employment. Fewer than 25% of clubs in any of the groups implemented neurological examinations of players at pre-employment, although 100% of rugby union (Premiership) and rugby league clubs implemented neurological testing during pre-season. CONCLUSIONS: None of the sports implemented best practice guidelines for the preparticipation evaluation of players at all stages of their employment. Departures from best practice guidelines and differences in practices between clubs within the same sport leave club physicians vulnerable if their players sustain injuries or ill health conditions that could have been identified and avoided through the implementation of a preparticipation examination.
机译:目的:确定在英国专业团队运动中对运动员进行的入职前,赛季前和伤后医学评估的水平。设计:邮政整体人口调查。地点:英格兰优秀的专业运动队。人口:由以下俱乐部组成的六组成员:职业足球(首屈一指,第20名中的15名;冠军,第24名中第22名),橄榄球联盟(首相,第12名中的9名;第1部门,第11名,第14名),橄榄球联盟(超级联赛,第6名,第16名) 11)和板球(县,18之12)。主要观察指标:俱乐部的数量(百分比),记录俱乐部球员的病史,并在入职前,换季前和受伤后对运动员的心血管,呼吸系统,神经系统和骨骼系统进行身体检查。结果:对调查的总体答复为74%,各组之间的比率为55%至92%。几乎90%的足球俱乐部(Premiership and Championship)和橄榄球联合会(Premiership)俱乐部都有球员的一般健康状况,心血管,呼吸系统,神经系统和肌肉骨骼系统的雇佣前历史记录,但少于板球和橄榄球联合会的50%( 1分部)俱乐部记录了历史。大多数足球俱乐部(英超和冠军联赛)和橄榄球联合会(英超)俱乐部在雇用前都对运动员进行了心血管和肌肉骨骼检查。在任何一组中,只有不到25%的俱乐部在职前对球员进行了神经系统检查,尽管橄榄球联盟(Premiership)和橄榄球联盟俱乐部的100%在赛季前进行了神经系统测试。结论:没有一项运动项目实施最佳实践准则来对运动员在其就业的各个阶段进行参与前评估。如果最佳实践准则与同一运动中的俱乐部之间的惯例有所出入,则俱乐部医师如果球员遭受受伤或健康状况不佳,则可以通过实施参与前检查来确定和避免这种伤害。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号