首页> 外文期刊>International angiology: A journal of the International Union of Angiology >Use of neck magnetic resonance venography, Doppler sonography and selective venography for diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a pilot study in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls.
【24h】

Use of neck magnetic resonance venography, Doppler sonography and selective venography for diagnosis of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a pilot study in multiple sclerosis patients and healthy controls.

机译:颈部磁共振静脉造影,多普勒超声和选择性静脉造影在诊断慢性脑脊髓静脉功能不全方面的应用:在多发性硬化症患者和健康对照者中的一项初步研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

AIM: Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency (CCSVI) is a vascular condition characterized by anomalies of primary veins outside the skull that restrict normal outflow of blood from the brain. CCSVI was recently described as highly prevalent in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and can be non-invasively diagnosed by Doppler sonography (DS) and invasively by selective venography (SV). The aim of this paper was to investigate the value of neck magnetic resonance venography (MRV) for the diagnosis of CCSVI compared to DS and SV in patients with MS and in healthy controls (HC). METHODS: Ten MS patients and 7 HC underwent DS, 2D-Time-Of-Flight venography (TOF) and 3D-Time Resolved Imaging of Contrast Kinetics angiography (TRICKS). MS patients also underwent SV. The internal jugular veins (IJVs) and the vertebral veins (VVs) were assessed by both MRV sequences, and the findings were validated against SV and DS. SV has been considered the diagnostic gold standard for MS patients. RESULTS: All MS patients and none of the HC presented CCSVI, according to the DS criteria. This was confirmed by SV. For CCSVI diagnosis, DS showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 100%, whereas the figures were 40%, 85%, 58%, 80% and 50% for 3D-TRICKS, and 30%, 85%, 52%, 75% and 46% for 2D-TOF in the IJVs. In MS patients, compared to SV, DS showed sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV and NPV of 100%, 75%, 95%, 94% and 100%, whereas the figures were 31%, 100%, 45%, 100% and 26% for 3D-TRICKS and 25%, 100%, 40%, 100% and 25% for 2D-TOF in the IJVs. CONCLUSION: The use of MRV for diagnosis of CCSVI in MS patients has limited value, and the findings should be interpreted with caution and confirmed by other imaging techniques such as DS and SV.
机译:目的:慢性脑脊髓静脉功能不全(CCSVI)是一种血管疾病,其特征是颅骨外的主要静脉异常,限制了正常血液从大脑流出。 CCSVI最近被描述为在多发性硬化症(MS)患者中高度流行,可以通过多普勒超声(DS)和选择性静脉造影(SV)进行无创诊断。本文的目的是探讨在MS患者和健康对照(HC)中,与DS和SV相比,颈部磁共振静脉造影(MRV)对CCSVI的诊断价值。方法:10例MS患者和7例HC接受了DS,2D飞行时间静脉造影(TOF)和3D时间分辨动力学造影血管造影(TRICKS)。 MS患者也接受了SV治疗。两种MRV序列均评估了颈内静脉(IJV)和椎静脉(VV),并针对SV和DS验证了发现。 SV被认为是MS患者的诊断金标准。结果:根据DS标准,所有MS患者且无HC出现CCSVI。这已被SV确认。对于CCSVI诊断,DS显示的敏感性,特异性,准确性,PPV和NPV为100%,而3D-TRICKS的数字分别为40%,85%,58%,80%和50%,30%,85%,52 IJV中2D-TOF的百分比,75%和46%。与SV相比,MS患者的DS敏感性,特异性,准确性,PPV和NPV分别为100%,75%,95%,94%和100%,而数字分别为31%,100%,45%,100% IJV中3D-TRICKS为26%,2D-TOF为25%,100%,40%,100%和25%。结论:MRV在MS患者中诊断CCSVI的价值有限,应谨慎解释并通过其他影像学技术(如DS和SV)予以证实。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号