首页> 外文期刊>International archives of allergy and immunology >Systematic Review on the Definition of Allergic Diseases in Children: The MeDALL Study
【24h】

Systematic Review on the Definition of Allergic Diseases in Children: The MeDALL Study

机译:系统评价儿童过敏性疾病的定义:MeDALL研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: During the last decades, a large number of phenotypes and disease classifications of allergic diseases have been proposed. Despite the heterogeneity across studies, no systematic review has been conducted on phenotype classification and the criteria that define allergic diseases. We aimed to identify clinically expressed, population-based phenotypes of allergic diseases and their interrelationships, to explore disease heterogeneity and to evaluate the measurements employed in disease diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a search of MEDLINE up to December 2012, to identify relevant original studies published in the English language that examine at least one objective of this systematic review in subjects aged 0-18 years. The screening of titles and abstracts and the extraction of data were conducted independently by two reviewers. Results: From a total of 13,767 citations, 197 studies met the criteria for inclusion, with 54% being cohort studies. Allergic diseases were studied as a single entity in 55% (109/197) of the studies or in the context of multimorbidity in 45%. Asthma accounted for 81.7% of the studies examining single diseases. Overall, up to 33 different phenotypes of allergic disease were reported. Transient early, late-onset and persistent wheeze were the most frequently reported phenotypes. Most studies (78%) used questionnaires. The skin-prick test was the preferred measurement of sensitization (64%). Spirometry and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were assessed in one third of the studies, peak flow rate in 8.6% and disease severity in 35%. Conclusions: Studies reporting phenotypes of allergic diseases in children are highly heterogeneous and often lack objective phenotypical measures. A concerted effort to standardize methods and terminology is necessary. (C) 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
机译:背景:在过去的几十年中,已经提出了许多过敏性疾病的表型和疾病分类。尽管研究之间存在异质性,但尚未对表型分类和定义过敏性疾病的标准进行系统的综述。我们旨在鉴定变应性疾病的临床表达,基于人群的表型及其相互关系,以探索疾病的异质性并评估在疾病诊断中采用的测量方法。方法:我们对截至2012年12月的MEDLINE进行了搜索,以发现以英语发表的相关原始研究,这些研究对0-18岁的受试者的这一系统评价的至少一个目标进行了检查。标题和摘要的筛选以及数据的提取由两名审阅者独立进行。结果:在总共13767次引用中,有197项研究符合纳入标准,其中54%为队列研究。在55%(109/197)的研究中,过敏性疾病是作为一个整体进行研究的,在45%的多发病率中是作为过敏性疾病进行的。哮喘占检查单一疾病的研究的81.7%。总体而言,报告了多达33种不同的过敏性表型。短暂的早期,迟发性和持续性喘息是最常报告的表型。大多数研究(78%)使用问卷。皮肤点刺试验是敏化度的首选测量方法(64%)。在三分之一的研究中评估了肺活量测定法和支气管高反应性,峰值流速为8.6%,疾病严重程度为35%。结论:报道儿童过敏性疾病表型的研究异质性很高,并且常常缺乏客观的表型检测手段。必须齐心协力使方法和术语标准化。 (C)2015 S.Karger AG,巴塞尔

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号