...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal of sports medicine >Biomechanical analysis of three tennis serve types using a markerless system
【24h】

Biomechanical analysis of three tennis serve types using a markerless system

机译:使用无标记系统对三种网球发球类型进行生物力学分析

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose The tennis serve is commonly associated with musculoskeletal injury. Advanced players are able to hit multiple serve types with different types of spin. No investigation has characterised the kinematics of all three serve types for the upper extremity and back. Methods Seven NCAA Division I male tennis players performed three successful flat, kick and slice serves. Serves were recorded using an eight camera markerless motion capture system. Laser scanning was utilised to accurately collect body dimensions and data were computed using inverse kinematic methods. Results There was no significant difference in maximum back extension angle for the flat, kick or slice serves. The kick serve had a higher force magnitude at the back than the flat and slice as well as larger posteriorly directed shoulder forces. The flat serve had significantly greater maximum shoulder internal rotation velocity versus the slice serve. Force and torque magnitudes at the elbow and wrist were not significantly different between the serves. Conclusions The kick serve places higher physical demands on the back and shoulder while the slice serve demonstrated lower overall kinetic forces. This information may have injury prevention and rehabilitation implications.
机译:目的网球发球通常与肌肉骨骼损伤有关。高级玩家可以用不同类型的旋转击中多种发球类型。尚无任何研究对上肢和背部三种服务类型的运动学进行特征分析。方法:七名NCAA I级男网球运动员成功完成了三场平,脚和分球。使用八台相机无标记运动捕获系统记录服务。利用激光扫描来准确地收集身体尺寸,并使用逆运动学方法计算数据。结果扁球,踢球或切球的最大后仰角度没有显着差异。脚踢发球的后部力比平坦部和片部更高,并且后方的肩部力更大。平坦的发球比片发球具有更大的最大肩内部旋转速度。两次发球时肘部和腕部的力和扭矩大小没有显着差异。结论脚踢发球对背部和肩膀的身体要求较高,而发球发球的整体动能较低。此信息可能会对伤害预防和康复产生影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号