首页> 外文期刊>International endodontic journal >Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments?
【24h】

Is the reciprocating movement per se able to improve the cyclic fatigue resistance of instruments?

机译:往复运动本身是否能够改善器械的抗周期性疲劳性能?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Aim: To compare cyclic fatigue resistance of two geometrically similar nickel-titanium instruments, used in conditions similar to clinical use in reciprocating and continuous rotary motion. Methodology: Four groups of eighteen instruments each, Reciproc? files sizes ISO 25 and 40 (R25 and R40) and Mtwo? files sizes ISO 25 and 40 (M25 and M40), were tested in reciprocating and continuous rotary motion, employing a novel experiment device. An artificial root canal (diameter, 1.4 mm; angle of curvature, 60 °; and curvature radius, 5 mm) was milled into a stainless steel block. To simulate clinical conditions, instead of rotating the file in static position, the set-up was designed to produce a continuous up-and-down pecking motion along the vertical axis of the instrument. Time to fracture (TTF) and push-pull cycles (PPC) were recorded, the number of cycles to fracture (NCF) was determined, and fractured instrument surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results: Mean time to fracture was 34.44 ± 8.58 min for R25 in reciprocation motion, 35.77 ± 4.82 min for R40 in reciprocation motion, 12.15 ± 1.74 min for M25 in continuous rotary motion and 13.27 ± 2.02 min for M40 in continuous rotary motion, whereas 28.52 ± 3.27 min for R25 in continuous rotary motion, 23.87 ± 1.52 min for R40 in continuous rotary motion, 31.07 ± 1.79 min for M25 in reciprocation motion and 31.08 ± 3.26 min for M40 in reciprocation motion. There was a significant difference (P 0.0001) for the cyclic fatigue resistance between the reciprocation motion and the continuous rotary motion groups. Reciproc? files in reciprocating movement had a significantly higher NCF than Mtwo? files, when used in continuous rotation. The highest resistance to failure was shown by Reciproc? files in reciprocation movement, followed by Mtwo? files in reciprocation and Reciproc? files in continuous motion. Mtwo? files in continuous rotary movement had the least resistance. SEM analysis of the fracture surface confirmed typical features of cyclic fatigue failure. Conclusion: Reciprocating movement increased the cyclic fatigue resistance of NiTi instruments.
机译:目的:比较两种几何形状相似的镍钛仪器的循环疲劳强度,该仪器在类似于临床用途的往复运动和连续旋转运动中使用。方法:四组,每组十八种仪器,互惠?文件大小为ISO 25和40(R25和R40)和Mtwo?使用新型实验装置,对文件大小为ISO 25和40(M25和M40)的文件进行往复和连续旋转运动测试。将人造根管(直径1.4毫米;曲率角60度;曲率半径5毫米)铣削到不锈钢块中。为了模拟临床状况,设计的装置不是沿静止位置旋转锉刀,而是沿器械的垂直轴产生连续的向上和向下的啄齿运动。记录断裂时间(TTF)和推挽循环(PPC),确定断裂循环数(NCF),并在扫描电子显微镜(SEM)下检查断裂的仪器表面。结果:往复运动的R25的平均断裂时间为34.44±8.58分钟,往复运动的R40的平均断裂时间为35.77±4.82分钟,连续旋转运动的M25的平均断裂时间为12.15±1.74分钟,而连续旋转运动的M40的平均断裂时间为13.27±2.02分钟。 R25连续旋转运动为28.52±3.27分钟,R40连续旋转运动为23.87±1.52分钟,M25往复运动为31.07±1.79分钟,M40往复运动为31.08±3.26分钟。往复运动和连续旋转运动组之间的循环疲劳强度存在显着差异(P <0.0001)。互惠?往复运动中的文件具有比Mtwo高得多的NCF?连续旋转时使用的文件。 Reciproc?对故障的抵抗力最高。往复运动中的文件,随后是Mtwo?往复运动中的文件?文件连续运动。 Mtwo?连续旋转运动的锉刀阻力最小。断裂表面的SEM分析证实了循环疲劳失效的典型特征。结论:往复运动增加了NiTi仪器的抗循环疲劳性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号