首页> 外文期刊>Internal medicine journal >Ethics and professional medical opinion and Guardianship and Administration legislation.
【24h】

Ethics and professional medical opinion and Guardianship and Administration legislation.

机译:道德和专业医学意见以及监护和管理法规。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The article by Bennett and Hallen raises important issues regarding the operation of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) and the guardianship process of concern. There are several additional points worth emphasizing:1 The only issue relevant to capacity assessment is capacity assessment, not cognitive, disability or tribunal's assessment. Neuropsychological assessments are often used to show disability, often to counter expert medical capacity assessment even though it must be remembered that neuropsychological assessment tests ability and disability, not capacity. Capacity can only be determined by a full clinical appraisal of the person/patient that includes an assessment of the person's physical and emotional condition at the time of the capacity assessment. This is the role of the experienced clinician, not the neuropsychologist, a tribunal member or a guardian, who have no training in clinical decision-making and medical assessment.
机译:Bennett和Hallen的文章提出了有关维多利亚州民事和行政法庭(VCAT)的运作以及所关注的监护程序的重要问题。还有几点需要强调:1与能力评估有关的唯一问题是能力评估,而不是认知,残疾或法庭的评估。神经心理学评估经常被用来显示残疾,尽管专家组必须记住神经心理学评估是测试能力和残疾,而不是能力,但常常用来对抗专家的医疗能力评估。只能通过对人/患者的全面临床评估来确定能力,评估包括在进行能力评估时对人的身体和情绪状况进行评估。这是经验丰富的临床医生的角色,而不是没有经过临床决策和医学评估培训的神经心理学家,法庭成员或监护人的角色。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号