...
首页> 外文期刊>biology and fertility of soils >Comparison and improvement of methods for determining soil dehydrogenase activity by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride and iodonitrotetrazolium chloride
【24h】

Comparison and improvement of methods for determining soil dehydrogenase activity by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride and iodonitrotetrazolium chloride

机译:Comparison and improvement of methods for determining soil dehydrogenase activity by using triphenyltetrazolium chloride and iodonitrotetrazolium chloride

获取原文
           

摘要

The triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) method described by Thalmann (1968) and the iodonitrotetrazolium chloride (INT) method described by Spothelfer-Magaña and Thalmann (1992), used for measuring soil dehydrogenase activity, have been modified to overcome some methodical short-comings. Absorption maxima of 485 nm for triphenylformazan dissolved in acetone, 491 nm for iodonitrotetrazolium formazan (INTF) dissolved in tetrahydrofuran and 455 nm for INTF dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide are recommended for measuring wavelengths. Extracting triphenylformazan twice with acetone is less toxic and proved to be at least as efficient as extraction with a mixture of 90 acetone and 10 carbon tetrachloride (Thalmann 1968 method). Tetrahydrofuran and dimethylformamide were equally good in extracting INTF from soils, but the former was less toxic. Anaerobic incubation resulted in the formation of higher amounts of triphenylformazan and INTF as well as reduced standard error. Both TTC and INT reduction showed high reproducibility and good differentiation of the microbial activity of six soils. For several reasons (more easily determined substrate dose depending on different soil types, better reduction, shorter incubation time), INT reduction seems to be a more suitable method of measuring soil microbial activity than TTC reduction

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号