首页> 外文期刊>International and Comparative Law Quarterly >Decisions of international tribunals: the international court of justice. II. Sovereignty over Palau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v Malaysia): The Philippines' Intervention
【24h】

Decisions of international tribunals: the international court of justice. II. Sovereignty over Palau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v Malaysia): The Philippines' Intervention

机译:国际法庭的决定:国际法院。二。帕劳·利吉丹(Palau Ligitan)和西巴丹岛(Pulau Sipadan)的主权(印度尼西亚诉马来西亚):菲律宾的干预

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

On 23 October 2001 the International Court rejected an Application by the Philippines to intervene in a case between Indonesia and Malaysia involving sovereignty over two small islands. The islands in question, Ligatan and Sipadan, are located in the South China Sea and are not themselves the Philippines' concern. Rather, its interest in the dispute stems from the claim of the Philippines to sovereignty over the adjacent territory of North Borneo which it considered might be affected by the Court's ruling on the islands' ownership. Consequently, when Indonesia and Malaysia referred their dispute to the Court in 1998 on the basis of a Special Agreement, the Philippines, after some delay, filed an Application to intervene in the case under Article 62 of the Statute. In accordance with Article 83(1) of the Rules of Court the Application was immediately communicated to Indonesia and Malaysia who in written replies indicated that they were opposed to it on various grounds. To decide whether the Application should be granted the Court therefore held public sittings in June 2001 to hear the arguments of the three States and four months later gave the judgment to which this note relates.
机译:2001年10月23日,国际法院驳回了菲律宾关于干预印度尼西亚和马来西亚之间涉及两个小岛主权的案件的申请。所涉及的岛屿利加丹和西巴丹岛位于南中国海,它们本身并不是菲律宾所关注的。相反,它对争端的兴趣源于菲律宾对北婆罗洲相邻领土的主权主张,它认为这可能会受到法院对这些岛屿所有权的裁决的影响。因此,当印度尼西亚和马来西亚于1998年根据特别协定将其争端提交法院时,菲律宾经过一番拖延后,根据《规约》第六十二条提出了干预该案的申请。根据《法院规则》第83条第(1)款,该申请已立即传达给印度尼西亚和马来西亚,后者书面答复表示,他们出于各种理由反对该请求。因此,为决定是否应批准该申请,法院于2001年6月举行公开听证会,听取了三个国家的论点,四个月后作出了与本说明有关的判决。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号