...
首页> 外文期刊>Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery >Is antero-posterior position superior to antero-lateral position for placement of electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation?
【24h】

Is antero-posterior position superior to antero-lateral position for placement of electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation?

机译:放置电极以进行房颤的体外复律时,前后位置是否优于前外侧位置?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

A best evidence topic in cardiac surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was whether the antero-posterior position is superior to the antero-lateral position for the placement of electrodes for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Altogether 167 papers were found using the reported search, of which 5 presented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results, and study weaknesses of these papers are tabulated. We conclude that there is no clinical difference between the two positions although if one position fails to convert the patient, the alternative position may still achieve success.
机译:根据结构化方案编写了心脏外科手术中的最佳证据主题。解决的问题是,在放置用于房颤的心脏复律的电极时,前后位置是否优于前外侧位置。报告检索共发现167篇论文,其中5篇是回答临床问题的最佳证据。这些论文的作者,期刊,出版日期和国家,研究的患者类别,研究类型,相关结果,结果和研究劣势均列于表格中。我们得出的结论是,尽管如果一个位置无法转换患者,则两个位置之间也没有临床差异,替代位置仍然可以取得成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号