首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient-based survey of analgesia and sedation.
【24h】

Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient-based survey of analgesia and sedation.

机译:德国重症监护病房的镇静和镇痛作用:如何在现实中完成?基于患者的镇痛和镇静调查结果。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

OBJECTIVE: This study carried out the first patient-oriented survey on the practice of analgesia and sedation in German intensive care units, examining whether the goals of early spontaneous breathing and awake, cooperative patients are achieved. DESIGN: A postal survey was sent to 261 hospitals in Germany. Each hospital received three patient-oriented forms with questions regarding current agents and techniques for analgesia and sedation of a specific patient. Responses were obtained from 220 (84%) hospitals which returned 305 questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients' Ramsay sedation scale was significantly higher in all phases of analgesia and sedation, indicating that the patients were more deeply sedated than currently intended by the therapist. Propofol was used for most of the patients during short-term sedation (57%) and during weaning (48%). The preferred agent for sedation longer than 72[Symbol: see text]h was midazolam (66%). CONCLUSION: The choice of agents and techniques for analgesia and sedationin the intensive care unit thus follows the German guidelines. The fact that the patients were more deeply sedated than intended by the therapist in all phases of sedation may be due to the low use of sedation scales and clinical practice guidelines or to the lack of training in using these techniques.
机译:目的:本研究对德国重症监护病房的镇痛和镇静作用进行了首次以患者为中心的调查,以检查是否实现了早期自然呼吸和清醒,合作患者的目标。设计:邮政调查已发送到德国的261家医院。每家医院都收到了三种以患者为中心的表格,其中涉及有关特定患者止痛和镇静的当前药物和技术的问题。从220家医院(84%)获得了答复,该医院返回了305份问卷。结果:在镇痛和镇静的所有阶段,患者的Ramsay镇静量表均显着较高,表明患者的镇静作用比治疗师当前预期的要深。在短期镇静期间(57%)和断奶期间(48%),大多数患者使用了异丙酚。镇静时间长于72 [h]的首选药物是咪达唑仑(66%)。结论:重症监护病房镇痛和镇静剂和技术的选择遵循德国指南。在镇静的所有阶段中,患者镇静程度均比治疗师预期的要高,这可能是由于镇静量表和临床实践指南使用率较低或缺乏使用这些技术的培训所致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号