首页> 外文期刊>Intensive care medicine >Science, medicine and industry: are we getting out of the black hole in sepsis research?
【24h】

Science, medicine and industry: are we getting out of the black hole in sepsis research?

机译:科学,医学和工业:我们是否在脓毒症研究中走出了黑洞?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this issue of Intensive Care Medicine, Finfer and colleagues describe an important new clinical trial which (re-)examines the effects of a not-so-new drug-recom-binant human activated protein C (rhAPC)-on outcome in sepsis [1]. This publication is important because it describes-at an early phase-the basis for and protocol of a study, which will hopefully not only clarify but also potentially change clinical use of this drug. The decision to inform the intensive care community of the trial right from the beginning also motivates this editorial, which reviews some aspects of the complexity of the relationship and interactions in the triangle of three major players (but not always ideal partners) involved in pertinent clinical research: science, medicine and industry.
机译:在本期《重症监护医学》中,Finfer及其同事描述了一项重要的新临床试验,该试验(重新)检查了不太新的药物重组人激活蛋白C(rhAPC)对败血症预后的影响[ 1]。该出版物之所以重要,是因为它在早期阶段就描述了研究的基础和方案,希望不仅可以阐明该药物,而且有可能改变该药物的临床用途。从一开始就将重症监护病情告知试验的决定也激发了这篇社论,该评论回顾了涉及相关临床的三个主要参与者(但并非总是理想的合作伙伴)的三角形中的关系和相互作用的复杂性的某些方面研究:科学,医学和工业。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号