首页> 外文期刊>Inhalation toxicology >Rat subchronic inhalation study of smoke from cigarettes containing flue-cured tobacco cured either by direct-fired or heat-exchanger curing processes.
【24h】

Rat subchronic inhalation study of smoke from cigarettes containing flue-cured tobacco cured either by direct-fired or heat-exchanger curing processes.

机译:对大鼠进行的亚慢性吸入性研究,研究对象是通过直接燃烧或热交换器固化过程烟熏的含有烤烟的卷烟。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

A subchronic, nose-only inhalation study compared the effects of mainstream smoke from a cigarette containing 100% flue-cured tobacco cured by a direct-fired process to that of a cigarette containing 100% flue-cured tobacco cured by a heat exchanger process. The tobaccos and mainstream smoke from tobaccos cured by the heat exchanger process have been shown to have significantly lower levels of tobacco-specific nitrosamines than tobaccos cured by a direct-fired process. Male and female rats were exposed for 1 h/day, 5 days/wk, for 13 wk to mainstream smoke at 0, 0.06, 0.20, or 0.80 mg wet total particulate matter per liter of air. Clinical signs, body and organ weights, clinical chemistry, hematology, carboxyhemoglobin, serum nicotine, plethysmography, gross pathology, and histopathology were determined. When histologic changes resulting from exposure to smoke from the two types of cigarettes were compared, the only significant difference was increased epithelial hyperplasia of the anterior nasal cavityin males in the high-exposure group for the heat-exchanger cigarette. At the end of the exposure period, subsets of rats from each group were maintained without smoke exposures for an additional 13 wk (recovery period). At the end of the recovery period, there were no statistically significant differences in histopathological findings observed between the heat-exchanger-cured tobacco cigarette when compared to the direct-fired cured tobacco cigarette. The complete toxicological assessment in this study of heat exchanger and direct-fired tobaccos suggests no overall biologically significant differences between the two cigarettes.
机译:一项仅次于鼻子的慢性吸入性研究比较了通过直接燃烧工艺处理的包含100%烤烟的香烟与通过热交换器工艺处理的100%烤烟的主流烟的影响。与直接燃烧方法相比,通过热交换器工艺处理过的烟草和主流烟的烟草特有亚硝胺水平明显降低。将雄性和雌性大鼠暴露于每周1小时,每天5天,每周13周,以每升空气中的0、0.06、0.20或0.80 mg湿总颗粒物使主流烟气暴露。确定了临床体征,体重和器官重量,临床化学,血液学,羧基血红蛋白,血清尼古丁,体积描记法,总体病理学和组织病理学。当比较两种香烟接触烟尘引起的组织学变化时,唯一的显着差异是在高剂量换热器香烟组中,男性前鼻腔上皮增生增加。在暴露期结束时,将每组大鼠的亚组维持无烟暴露另外13周(恢复期)。在恢复期结束时,与直接燃烧的烟丝相比,在热交换烟丝之间观察到的组织病理学发现没有统计学上的显着差异。在对换热器和直燃烟草的这项研究中,完整的毒理学评估表明,这两支卷烟在生物学上没有总体上的显着差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号