首页> 外文期刊>Intelligence: A Multidisciplinary Journal >Can intelligence explain the overrepresentation of liberals and leftists in American academia?
【24h】

Can intelligence explain the overrepresentation of liberals and leftists in American academia?

机译:情报可以解释美国学术界的自由派和左派派代表过多吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

It is well known that individuals with so-called liberal or leftist views are overrepresented in American academia. By bringing together data on American academics, the general population and a high-IQ population, the present study investigates how much of this overrepresentation can be explained by intelligence. It finds that intelligence can account for most of the disparity between academics and the general population on the issues of abortion, homosexuality and traditional gender roles. By contrast, it finds that intelligence cannot account for any of the disparity between academics and the general population on the issue of income inequality. But for methodological reasons, this finding is tentative. Furthermore, the paper finds that intelligence may account for less than half of the disparity on liberal versus conservative ideology, and much less than half the disparity on Democrat versus Republican identity. Following the analysis, eight alternative explanations for liberal and leftist overrepresentation are reviewed. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc All rights reserved.
机译:众所周知,在美国学术界,具有所谓自由派或左派观点的个人人数过多。通过将有关美国学者,普通人群和智商高的人群的数据汇总在一起,本研究调查了这种过高的代表性可以用智力来解释多少。研究发现,智力可以解决学者与普通民众之间在堕胎,同性恋和传统性别角色问题上的大部分差距。相比之下,它发现智力无法解决学者与普通民众之间在收入不平等问题上的任何差距。但是出于方法论的原因,这一发现是暂时的。此外,该论文发现,在自由主义与保守派意识形态之间的差异中,智力可能占不到一半,而在民主党与共和党身份上的差异则远远小于一半。分析之后,回顾了关于自由派和左派代表过多的八种替代解释。 (C)2015 Elsevier Inc保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号