首页> 外文期刊>Information Polity: The International Journal of Government and Democracy in the Information Age >The challenge of deliberative democracy online - A comparison of face-to-face and virtual experiments in citizen deliberation
【24h】

The challenge of deliberative democracy online - A comparison of face-to-face and virtual experiments in citizen deliberation

机译:在线协商民主的挑战-公民审议中面对面和虚拟实验的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two contemporary promises of participatory democracy are addressed in the present article; (a) democratic decisions reached in small group deliberation between lay citizens and (b) the possibility to exploit information and communication technology in democratic dialogue and decision making. Initially, a quasi-experimental approach was used to explore the potential and impact of face-to-face deliberation between citizens. In this design, a random sample of adult citizens was first surveyed and invited to take part in the experiment. The original face-to-face experiment was a one-day event where the participants received impartial information, questioned an expert panel and discussed in small groups. The participants were randomly allocated to 12 small groups consisting of a dozen persons each. The question at hand was whether a sixth nuclear power plant should be constructed in Finland. Later on, the face-to-face experiment was replicated virtually. The article has two main research questions. First, it investigates how a virtual environment can be used for deliberation and decision making. Second, it examines how information and deliberation in small groups affect participants' knowledge and opinions on energy politics. It is found that both modes show considerable resemblance in their outcome.
机译:本文讨论了当代两个参与式民主的承诺。 (a)在非专业公民之间进行小组讨论时达成的民主决定;(b)在民主对话和决策中利用信息和通信技术的可能性。最初,采用半实验方法来探索公民之间面对面审议的潜力和影响。在此设计中,首先对成年公民的随机样本进行了调查,并邀请他们参加实验。最初的面对面实验是为期一天的活动,参与者可以得到公正的信息,对专家小组进行了质疑并进行了小组讨论。参与者被随机分配到12个小组,每小组12人。当前的问题是,是否应在芬兰建造第六座核电站。后来,虚拟地进行了面对面的实验。本文有两个主要的研究问题。首先,它研究了如何将虚拟环境用于审议和决策。其次,研究小组中的信息和审议如何影响参与者对能源政治的知识和见解。发现这两种模式在其结果中显示出相当的相似性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号