首页> 外文期刊>Intellectual Property Quarterly. >EU Geographical Indications v US Trade Marks: TKO against the International Harmonisation of the Protection of Geographical Indications?
【24h】

EU Geographical Indications v US Trade Marks: TKO against the International Harmonisation of the Protection of Geographical Indications?

机译:欧盟地理标志诉美国商标:将军澳反对地理标志保护的国际统一吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Kobe Beef, Champagne, Florida Oranges, Washington Apples, Idaho Potatoes, Prosciutto di Parma, Parmigiano Reggiano and Feta cheese are examples of geographical indications (GIs). However, not all these GIs are protected equally or in the same manner under national intellectual property laws. These differences in the protection of GIs are a problem for the international harmonisation of the protection of GIs. In particular, the United States protects the GIs under trade mark laws, which exacerbates the extension of the current protection of GIs for several reasons. Specifically, problem areas for the protection of GIs under the US trade mark system are generic names, priority, exclusivity and an extension of a heightened protection for foodstuffs. On the other side, in the European Union GIs are protected as a separate form of intellectual property and are less bound by generic limits, priority and exclusivity.
机译:神户牛肉,香槟,佛罗里达州的橘子,华盛顿苹果,爱达荷州的土豆,意大利熏火腿,帕马森芝士和羊乳酪都是地理标志(GI)的示例。但是,并非所有这些地理标志都受到国家知识产权法的平等保护或同等保护。地理标志的保护方面的这些差异是地理标志保护的国际统一问题。特别是,美国根据商标法保护地理标志,这出于几个原因而加剧了当前对地理标志的保护的范围。具体来说,在美国商标制度下,地理标志的保护问题包括通用名称,优先权,排他性和对食品的加强保护的扩展。另一方面,在欧洲联盟,地理标志作为一种单独的知识产权形式受到保护,不受通用限制,优先权和排他性的约束。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号