首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Collider bias in trauma comparative effectiveness research: The stratification blues for systematic reviews
【24h】

Collider bias in trauma comparative effectiveness research: The stratification blues for systematic reviews

机译:对撞机在创伤比较效果研究中的偏见:系统评价的分层蓝调

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Background: Collider bias, or stratifying data by a covariate consequence rather than cause (confounder) of treatment and outcome, plagues randomised and observational trauma research. Of the seven trials of prehospital hypertonic saline in dextran (HSD) that have been evaluated in systematic reviews, none found an overall between-group difference in survival, but four reported significant subgroup effects. We hypothesised that an avoidable type of collider bias often introduced inadvertently into trauma comparative effectiveness research could explain the incongruous findings.
机译:背景:对撞机偏差,或通过协变量结果而不是治疗和结果的原因(混杂因素)对数据进行分层,困扰着随机和观察性创伤研究。在系统评价中评估的七项院前右旋糖酐高渗盐水(HSD)试验中,没有发现组间生存的总体差异,但是四项报告了显着的亚组效应。我们假设,通常在无意中将可避免类型的对撞机偏向引入创伤比较效果研究中,可以解释这种不一致的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号