...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Causes of scapula fractures differ from other shoulder injuries in occupants seriously injured during motor vehicle crashes.
【24h】

Causes of scapula fractures differ from other shoulder injuries in occupants seriously injured during motor vehicle crashes.

机译:肩cap骨骨折的原因与其他人的肩部受伤不同,在车祸中受伤严重的乘员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

PURPOSE: Current motor vehicle safety systems primarily focus on preventing life-threatening and serious injury during crashes, but occupants may still sustain less serious injury. Upper extremity injury is common in occupants involved in motor vehicle crashes. The purpose of this study was to compare occupants with scapula fractures to occupants with other shoulder injuries. METHODS: We used data from the Crash Injury Research and Engineering Network (CIREN) database (1997-2008) to compare two groups of occupants: (1) occupants with only scapula fractures and (2) occupants with shoulder injury not involving the scapula. We hypothesised that there were no differences in demographics, vehicle, crash characteristics and causes of shoulder injury in these two groups. RESULTS: Of the 3370 occupants studied, 54 occupants (1.6%) had only a scapula fracture in the shoulder region and 342 (10.1%) occupants had other shoulder injuries. There were significant differences between gender, height and weight, maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) severity and the crash type. Occupants with scapula fractures were 3 times more likely to be male (odds ratio (OR)=3.30) and were significantly taller and weighed more than occupants with other shoulder injuries. Occupants with other shoulder injuries had significantly greater injury severity (based on maximum AIS for any injury) than those with scapula fractures. There was a significant difference between scapula fractures and clavicle fractures (OR=1.87) and joint dislocations/separations (OR=2.79) comparing the cause of injury (vehicle side interior vs. other causes). Safety belts are the single most important safety system in motor vehicles and should always be worn. However, we found no differences in the cause of scapula fractures comparing occupants wearing their safety belt with those not wearing the belt. CONCLUSION: This study provides information showing that scapula fractures occur during different types of impacts and have different causes other than shoulder injuries.
机译:目的:当前的机动车辆安全系统主要侧重于防止在撞车过程中危及生命和严重伤害,但乘员仍可能受到较少的严重伤害。上肢受伤在涉及机动车碰撞的乘员中很常见。这项研究的目的是将肩骨骨折的乘员与其他肩部受伤的乘员进行比较。方法:我们使用了碰撞伤害研究与工程网络(CIREN)数据库(1997-2008年)中的数据来比较两组乘员:(1)仅肩骨骨折的乘员和(2)肩部受伤但不涉及肩骨的乘员。我们假设这两组的人口统计学,车辆,碰撞特征和肩部受伤原因没有差异。结果:在研究的3370名乘员中,有54名(1.6%)乘员仅在肩部出现肩cap骨骨折,而342名(10.1%)乘员遭受了其他肩部受伤。性别,身高和体重,最大简短伤害量表(AIS)严重程度和碰撞类型之间存在显着差异。肩cap骨骨折的乘员是男性的可能性高3倍(优势比(OR)= 3.30),比其他肩部受伤的乘员高得多,体重也更大。与肩cap骨骨折者相比,其他肩部受伤者的受伤严重程度(基于任何伤害的最大AIS)明显更高。比较损伤原因(车辆内侧和其他原因),肩骨骨折和锁骨骨折(OR = 1.87)与关节脱位/分离(OR = 2.79)之间存在显着差异。安全带是机动车辆中最重要的单一安全系统,应始终佩戴。但是,与佩戴安全带的乘员与未佩戴安全带的乘员相比,我们发现肩骨骨折的原因没有差异。结论:这项研究提供的信息表明,肩cap骨骨折发生在不同类型的撞击中,除了肩部受伤以外,其原因也不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号