...
首页> 外文期刊>Injury >Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: Plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing.
【24h】

Treatment of distal tibial metaphyseal fractures: Plating versus shortened intramedullary nailing.

机译:胫骨干meta端骨折的治疗:电镀与缩短髓内钉治疗。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

BACKGROUND: Fractures in the distal tibial metaphysis are more complicated to treat than diaphyseal fractures. We compared treatment with plating to treatment with shorted intramedullary (IM) nailing. METHODS: Patients with AO type 43A fractures were treated with plate fixation (group A, n=14) or shortened IM nailing (group B, n = 13). We compared postoperative radiographic deformities, functional results (Iowa ankle scores), and symptoms (Olerud and Molander ankle scores). RESULTS: All fractures had healed at final follow-up (mean, 33 month). Mean union times were 27.8 week (range, 18-36 week) in group A and 22.6 week (range, 18-30 week) in group B (P<0.05). Mean postoperative valgus angulations were larger in group B (3.7 degrees ) than in group A (0.5 degrees ) (P<0.05). However, malunions did not differ between groups (P<0.05). Functional results and postoperative symptoms were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Both plate fixation and shortened IM nailing were effective for treating distal tibial metaphyseal fractures.
机译:背景:胫骨干meta端骨折比干phy端骨折更复杂。我们比较了镀敷治疗与短髓内钉治疗。方法:采用钢板固定(A组,n = 14)或缩短IM钉(B组,n = 13)治疗AO型43A骨折患者。我们比较了术后放射线畸形,功能结果(爱荷华州踝关节评分)和症状(Olerud和Molander踝关节评分)。结果:所有骨折均在最终随访中治愈(平均33个月)。 A组的平均联合时间为27.8周(范围18-36周),B组的平均联合时间为22.6周(范围18-30周)(P <0.05)。 B组(3.7度)的平均术后外翻角度大于A组(0.5度)(P <0.05)。然而,畸形畸形组之间没有差异(P <0.05)。功能结果和术后症状相似。结论:钢板固定和缩短的IM钉治疗胫骨干meta端远端骨折均有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号