...
首页> 外文期刊>InTech >Automated barrier doors and new standards in robotic safety
【24h】

Automated barrier doors and new standards in robotic safety

机译:自动防护门和机器人安全新标准

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The past few years have been marked by significant changes in industrial safety standards in the U.S. Safety managers, plant managers, and others who are not carefully monitoring these developments may not be keeping pace with the latest codes and regulations. According to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), "machine guarding" that pertains to machines' general requirements and general industry (29 CFR 1910.212) consistently falls in the top ten most frequently cited OSHA standards violated in any given year. When combined with newly introduced safety regulations, it is easy to understand why this commonly misunderstood topic is more confusing than ever. The multitude of robotic applications and the growth of robot use and automation in all industries only worsens the problem. Conducting a thorough risk assessment is the best way to maintain a safe work environment, especially when adding new automated processes. Thanks to the new Robotic Industries Association (RIA) R15.06-2013 standard, proper risk assessments are no longer just a best practice; they are mandatory.
机译:过去几年来,美国工业安全标准发生了重大变化,安全经理,工厂经理和其他未仔细监控这些进展的人可能未跟上最新的法规和规定。根据美国职业安全与健康管理局(OSHA)的规定,与机器的一般要求和一般行业相关的“机器防护”(29 CFR 1910.212)始终是在任何一年中被违反的OSHA标准中最常被引用的前十名。当与新引入的安全法规结合使用时,很容易理解为什么这个通常被误解的主题比以往更加令人困惑。在所有行业中,大量的机器人应用以及机器人使用和自动化的增长只会使问题变得更糟。进行全面的风险评估是维护安全工作环境的最佳方法,尤其是在添加新的自动化流程时。借助新的机器人工业协会(RIA)R15.06-2013标准,正确的风险评估不再只是最佳实践;它们是强制性的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号