首页> 外文期刊>Industry and innovation >Obliging Institutions and Industry Evolution: A Comparative Study of the German and UK Wind Energy Industries
【24h】

Obliging Institutions and Industry Evolution: A Comparative Study of the German and UK Wind Energy Industries

机译:强制性制度与产业演进:德国和英国风能产业的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper firstly examines the relationship between state coordination and wind energy growth by comparing the differences between UK and German institutional configurations and state involvements in the 1990s. While the EU was calling for a unified regulatory framework for its member states, the UK and Germany adopted very different renewable energy policies. The evidence of the early 1990s shows that the British government employed "deregulation" with so limited state involvement that wind energy project developers faced thorny development problems, while the German government tried to require the electricity supply industry to purchase expensive wind power by "regulation" but encountered formidable resistance. Nevertheless, both the British and German administrations later could resolve these problems through new forms of state power. This suggests that, firstly, neither "deregulation" nor "regulation" is an effective means to develop wind power with increasing electricity liberalization and regionalization. Secondly, "obliging" regulations and state powers are vital to the policy outcome by harnessing the state's institutional capacity to smooth out technology innovation and diffusion.
机译:本文首先通过比较1990年代英国和德国的体制结构和国家参与之间的差异,研究了国家协调与风能增长之间的关系。欧盟呼吁为其成员国建立统一的监管框架时,英国和德国采用了截然不同的可再生能源政策。 1990年代初期的证据表明,英国政府在国家参与程度有限的情况下采用了“地方法规”,以至于风能项目开发商面临棘手的发展问题,而德国政府则试图要求电力供应行业通过“法规”购买昂贵的风能。但遇到了强大的阻力。尽管如此,后来英国和德国政府都可以通过新的国家权力形式解决这些问题。这表明,首先,随着电力自由化和区域化的发展,“取消管制”或“监管”都不是发展风力发电的有效手段。其次,“强制性”法规和国家权力通过利用国家的机构能力来平滑技术创新和传播,对政策成果至关重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号