首页> 外文期刊>international endodontic journal >The use of E‐speed film for root canal length determination
【24h】

The use of E‐speed film for root canal length determination

机译:使用E-speed薄膜测定根管长度

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

SummaryThis study compared the use of D‐speed and E‐speed dental X‐ray film for assessing the working length of root canals.Root canal files of varying size (ISO 06, 08, 10 and 15) were placed in the root canals of a maxillary molar and a mandibular molar in a dried skull and mandible. Files were set at various lengths relative to the radiographic apex. The X‐ray projections were kept constant. Exposure settings for the two film types that gave comparable radio‐graphic density were selected. Films were developed manually under standardized conditions. A total of 48 films of each type were examined at various magnifications by four trained examiners for the estimation of distance between the file tip and radiographic apex.There were no differences between examiners in estimating working length. The effect of file size, root and magnification were also not significant. The differences between the film types were not significant (P<0.05).It is concluded that clinicians should use E‐speed film instead of D‐speed film for root canal length measurement, because the exposure time was reduced by over 40 but the quality of the radiographic image was not significan
机译:摘要本研究比较了使用 D 速和 E 速牙科 X 射线胶片评估根管工作长度的情况。将不同大小(ISO 06、08、10 和 15)的根管锉放置在干燥的颅骨和下颌骨的上颌磨牙和下颌磨牙的根管中。锉刀相对于射线照相顶点设置在不同的长度上。X射线投影保持恒定。选择具有可比射线照相密度的两种胶片类型的曝光设置。薄膜是在标准化条件下手动显影的。四名训练有素的检查员在不同放大倍率下检查了每种类型的总共 48 张胶片,以估计锉刀尖端和射线照相顶点之间的距离。审查员在估计工作长度方面没有差异。文件大小、根部和放大倍率的影响也不显著。不同薄膜类型间差异不显著(P<0.05)。结论是,临床医生应该使用E-speed胶片而不是D-speed胶片进行根管长度测量,因为曝光时间减少了40%以上,但X线成像图像的质量并不重要。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号