首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >How Prevalent Are the Different Types of Organizational Justice Research?
【24h】

How Prevalent Are the Different Types of Organizational Justice Research?

机译:组织司法研究的不同类型有多普遍?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In his article, Greenberg (2009) classifiedjustice research into four types. Basicresearch uncovers the nature and structureof justice; implication research examinesrelationships of justice with organization-relevant phenomena; intervention researchassesses the efficacy of initiatives designedto cultivate justice; and case study researchdescribes anecdotal applications of justiceinitiatives. As he noted, the justice literatureis predominantly comprised of basic andimplication research, while little work hasput into practice of the knowledge thathas been gained from this research. As aresult, very few examples of interventionand case study research exist. The goalof this commentary is to add numbers to Greenberg's taxonomy of the justiceliterature in order to determine the currentstate of intervention research as well astrends in this research. To do so, we usedthe aforementioned taxonomy to classifyjustice papers that were published duringthe past 15 years. Our methods and resultsare described below.
机译:Greenberg(2009)在他的文章中将正义研究分为四种类型。基础研究揭示了正义的本质和结构;蕴涵研究考察了正义与组织相关现象的关系;干预研究评估旨在促进正义的举措的有效性;案例研究描述了司法措施的轶事应用。正如他指出的那样,司法文献主要由基础研究和蕴涵研究组成,而从这项研究中获得的知识却很少投入实践。结果,很少有干预和案例研究的例子。本评论的目的是在格林伯格的司法文学分类法中增加数字,以便确定干预研究的当前状态以及在该研究中的进阶。为此,我们使用上述分类法对过去15年中发表的正义论文进行了分类。我们的方法和结果描述如下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号