...
首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and organizational psychology >How Journals Can Facilitate the Study of Underlying Situational Characteristics Distinguishing Worker and Professional Samples
【24h】

How Journals Can Facilitate the Study of Underlying Situational Characteristics Distinguishing Worker and Professional Samples

机译:期刊如何促进区分员工和专业样本的潜在情境特征

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Bergman and Jean's (2016) focal article decries the limited research attention of industrial and organizational (I-O) psychologists on workersthat is, employees such as wage earners, frontline workers, and contractors, who do not fill professional, managerial, or executive positions. We agree. In addition to the scientific and moral benefits of studying workers, there is a practical imperative. An academic discipline that comes across as being disinterested in workers may leave itself open to charges of being the handmaiden of management (Hulin, 2002, p. 12). Moreover, such an academic discipline may be ill prepared to provide evidence-based contributions to important societal debates on topics such as income inequality and immigration.
机译:Bergman和Jean(2016)的重点文章谴责了工业和组织(I-O)心理学家对工人的研究关注有限,这些工人是指诸如薪水收入者,一线工人和承包商之类的员工,他们没有担任专业,管理或行政职务。我们同意。除了学习工人的科学和道德利益外,还有实际的必要性。一门对劳动者不感兴趣的学科可能会成为管理的女仆的指控(Hulin,2002,第12页)。而且,这样的学科可能不准备为基于证据的贡献,以重要的社会辩论为主题,例如收入不平等和移民。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号