首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Corporate Change >Global competition for scientific talent: evidence from location decisions of PhDs and postdocs in 16 countries
【24h】

Global competition for scientific talent: evidence from location decisions of PhDs and postdocs in 16 countries

机译:全球科学人才竞争:来自16个国家的博士和博士后的选址决定的证据

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We analyze the decisions of foreign-born PhD and postdoctoral trainees in four natural science fields to come to the United States vs. go to another country for training. Data are drawn from the GlobSci survey of research scientists in 16 countries. A major reason individuals report coming to train in the United States is the prestige of its programs and/or career prospects; perceived lifestyle in the United States is a major factor individuals report for training elsewhere. The availability of exchange programs elsewhere is associated with fewer PhD students coming to the United States. The relative unattractiveness of fringe benefits in the United States is associated with going elsewhere for postdoctoral training. Countries that have been nibbling at the US PhD and postdoc share are Australia, Germany, and Switzerland; France and Great Britain have gained appeal in attracting postdocs, but not in attracting PhD students. Canada has made gains in neither.
机译:我们分析了四个自然科学领域中外国出生的博士和博士后实习生到美国与去另一个国家接受培训的决定。数据来自对16个国家/地区的研究科学家进行的GlobSci调查。个人报告来美国培训的主要原因是其课程和/或职业前景的声望。在美国,人们认为的生活方式是个人报告要在其他地方接受培训的主要因素。其他地方交流计划的出现与来美国的博士生减少有关。在美国,附带福利的相对缺乏吸引力与去其他地方进行博士后培训有关。一直在争抢美国博士学位和博士后学位的国家是澳大利亚,德国和瑞士;法国和英国吸引了博士后,但没有吸引博士生。加拿大都没有取得进展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号