首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Corporate Change >Is one path enough? Multiple paths and path interaction as an extension of path dependency theory
【24h】

Is one path enough? Multiple paths and path interaction as an extension of path dependency theory

机译:一条路够吗?多路径和路径交互作为路径依赖理论的延伸

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

To explain the development of multi-technology companies and industries where several alternative technologies co-exist and interact over long periods, this article suggests an extension of path dependency theory by providing a conceptualization of the path notion that incorporates the theoretical possibility of multiple paths and path interaction. The conceptualization is applied to a patent study of three leading companies in the lighting industry: General Electric, Osram/Siemens, and Philips. The study shows technology development patterns that are characterized by strong persistence, both within each path and across the whole technology field. These results demonstrate that multiple technological paths can co-exist in companies and industries, characterized by simultaneous long-term presence of several technologies. In such cases, path interaction takes place both between co-existing paths and when new, radically different paths are created. Although further studies are needed to identify the underlying self-reinforcing mechanisms, there is a clear indication that technological path dependency is not restricted to unitary progression patterns, as implied by previous conceptualizations.
机译:为了解释长期存在多种替代技术并相互作用的多技术公司和行业的发展,本文提出了路径依赖理论的扩展,方法是提供路径概念的概念化,该概念结合了多路径和多路径的理论可能性。路径互动。该概念化应用于照明行业的三家领先公司的专利研究:通用电气,欧司朗/西门子和飞利浦。这项研究显示了技术开发模式,这些技术开发模式在每个路径内以及整个技术领域都具有强大的持久性。这些结果表明,多种技术路径可以在公司和行业中共存,其特征是同时长期存在多种技术。在这种情况下,路径交互既会在共存路径之间发生,又会在创建新的根本不同的路径时发生。尽管需要进一步的研究来确定潜在的自我强化机制,但有明确的迹象表明,技术路径的依赖性并不局限于先前的概念所暗示的单一进展模式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号