首页> 外文期刊>Industrial and Corporate Change >Trading 'best practices' - a good practice?
【24h】

Trading 'best practices' - a good practice?

机译:交易“最佳做法”-一个好的做法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In this article, we analyze approaches for identifying and transferring "best practices." The relevant literature shows that both, the identification and the transfer practices, are extremely difficult processes. Nevertheless, management consultants position themselves and are seen by others as specialists in identifying and transferring effective or even best practices. We analyze qualitative (interviews) and quantitative (survey) data on the ways in which German management consultants specializing on strategy and process design try to identify and transfer "best practices." Our results document that consultants neither agree on the methods with which to identify best practices nor on the possibilities to transfer them between organizations within one or between different industries. We show that attempts to transfer best practices are hampered with severe stickiness - even for consultants. We conclude that best practices are mere marketing constructs of management consultants and suggest reframing discussions on them around organizational routines and rules.
机译:在本文中,我们分析了识别和转移“最佳实践”的方法。相关文献表明,识别和转移实践都是极其困难的过程。但是,管理顾问会定位自己,并被其他人视为识别和转移有效甚至最佳实践的专家。我们对定性(访谈)和定量(调查)数据进行分析,这些数据涉及专门研究策略和流程设计的德国管理顾问试图识别和转移“最佳实践”的方式。我们的结果表明,顾问们既不认同识别最佳实践的方法,也不认同在一个行业内或不同行业之间的组织之间转移最佳实践的可能性。我们证明,即使是对于顾问来说,尝试转移最佳实践的尝试也会因严重的粘性而受到阻碍。我们得出的结论是,最佳实践仅仅是管理顾问的营销构架,并建议围绕组织惯例和规则重新讨论它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号