...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Veterinary Medicine >Comparative efficacy of indirect tests in diagnosis of bovine sub clinical mastitis
【24h】

Comparative efficacy of indirect tests in diagnosis of bovine sub clinical mastitis

机译:间接测试在诊断牛亚临床性乳腺炎中的比较功效

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The present study was conducted on total 614 quarter milk samples collected from 162 apparently healthy lactating cows to determine the comparative efficacy of California mastitis test (CMT) and White side test (WST) in the detection of Subclinical mastitis (SCM) in dairy cows taking somatic cell count (SCC) as standard test. On comparison with SCC, the sensitivity of CMT and WST were 90.63 and 86.72 %, respectively. CMT revealed 93.83% specificity as compared to 89.50% of WST. The percent positive and negative predictive values for CMT were calculated to be 79.45 and 97.43%, respectively, while for WST these were 68.52 and 96.24%, respectively. The overall agreement of CMT (93.16%) was found to be higher than that of WST (88.92%).
机译:本研究对从162例健康的泌乳母牛身上采集的总共614个季度的牛奶样品进行了研究,以确定加利福尼亚乳腺炎测试(CMT)和白方测试(WST)在检测服用奶牛的亚临床乳腺炎(SCM)中的比较功效。体细胞计数(SCC)作为标准测试。与SCC相比,CMT和WST的灵敏度分别为90.63和86.72%。 CMT的特异性为93.83%,而WST的特异性为89.50%。 CMT的阳性预测值和阴性预测值的百分比分别为79.45和97.43%,而WST分别为68.52和96.24%。发现CMT的总体协议(93.16%)高于WST(88.92%)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号