...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Pure & Applied Physics >Comparison of methodologies of gamma ray spectrometer and X-ray fluorescence
【24h】

Comparison of methodologies of gamma ray spectrometer and X-ray fluorescence

机译:伽玛射线能谱仪和X射线荧光仪的方法学比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Gamma-ray spectrometric analysis is often considered as an ideal method for thorium analysis, which would otherwise require the use of more tedious, time consuming and often less precise chemical methods. With the development of rare earth research, X-ray fluorescence spectrometry analysis has become an important means of rare earth elements analysis and has been playing an increasingly important role. In the present study, the XRF-spectrometry and gamma-spectrometric techniques have been carried out in determining the concentration of thorium in monazite bearing sand samples. Monazite is the principal source of thorium and the rare earth elements but its composition and the distribution may vary within very wide limits. Both XRF and Gamma-ray spectrometry techniques use uncharged radiation, although of different in origin, to identify and estimate concentrations of elements present in the sample. However, the XRF method is much quicker and the amount of sample needed for analysis is much less compared to gamma spectrometry analysis. The correlation study of the results obtained by these two methods was analysed and compared.
机译:伽玛射线光谱分析通常被认为是th分析的理想方法,否则将需要使用更繁琐,耗时且通常不太精确的化学方法。随着稀土研究的发展,X射线荧光光谱分析已成为稀土元素分析的重要手段,并发挥着越来越重要的作用。在本研究中,已经进行了XRF光谱和γ光谱测定技术来测定独居石砂样品中samples的浓度。独居石是th和稀土元素的主要来源,但其组成和分布可能在很宽的范围内变化。 XRF和伽玛射线能谱技术都使用不带电辐射,尽管其起源不同,但它们可以识别和估算样品中存在的元素浓度。但是,与γ谱分析相比,XRF方法要快得多,分析所需的样品量要少得多。分析和比较了通过这两种方法获得的结果的相关性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号