...
首页> 外文期刊>Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources >Interplay of National and International Laws on Access to Biological Resources and Benefit Sharing
【24h】

Interplay of National and International Laws on Access to Biological Resources and Benefit Sharing

机译:国家和国际法在获取生物资源和利益分享方面的相互作用

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

International laws, emerging often from legally binding global conventions and treaties, operate through national laws extending their jurisdiction beyond their national boundaries but may also sometime override them. When a country becomes contracting party to several such treaties, and their provisions seem to be in conflict, problems may arise in fulfilling national obligations. Provisions on intellectual property rights under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and the WTO-TRIPS Agreement over products and processes, based on biological resources, illustrate this point. Likewise, provisions on sharing of benefits arising from the use of genetic resources under CBD and the Nagoya Protocol on one side and the International Treaty on PlantGenetic Resources for Food & Agriculture and the FAO Commission on Genetic Resources for Food & Agriculture on the other, seem to differ in many ways. This paper discusses the complex interplay of governance of access to genetic resources and benefit sharing at the international and national levels.
机译:国际法通常是从具有法律约束力的全球公约和条约中产生的,它们通过国家法律来运作,将其管辖范围扩大到其国界之外,但有时也可能超越它们。当一个国家成为若干此类条约的缔约国,并且它们的规定似乎有冲突时,在履行国家义务时可能会出现问题。 《生物多样性公约》和《 WTO-TRIPS协定》关于基于生物资源的产品和工艺的知识产权规定就说明了这一点。同样,关于共享根据《生物多样性公约》和《名古屋议定书》使用遗传资源所产生的惠益的规定,另一方面,关于《粮食及农业植物遗传资源国际条约》和粮农组织粮食及农业遗传资源委员会的规定似乎在许多方面有所不同。本文讨论了在国际和国家层面上获取遗传资源和利益分享治理的复杂相互作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号