首页> 外文期刊>Indian journal of pharmacology. >Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial
【24h】

Comparison of efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine in patients of allergic rhinitis: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial

机译:孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪和孟鲁司特-非索非那定在变应性鼻炎患者中的疗效,安全性和成本效益比较:一项随机,双盲临床试验

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Objectives: Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a global health problem. Almost 10%u25% of population worldwide is affected by AR. Oral/intranasal H1-antihistamine, decongestants, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and intranasal corticosteroids are the pillars in the management of AR. The combination therapy of montelukast with antihistaminic provides enhancing and complimentary effects, thereby reducing the symptoms effectively, but there are scanty data regarding the comparisons of combinations. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of montelukast-levocetirizine and montelukast-fexofenadine combination in patients of AR. Materials and Methods: Seventy patients with AR participated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, comparative 4-week trial. The patients between the age group of 18u65 years of either gender having moderate-severe intermittent or mild persistent AR were included in the study. The study inclusion criteria required the patients with total nasal symptom score (TNSS) of 5 or higher. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups with montelukast-levocetirizine (10 mg and 5 mg) in one group and montelukast-fexofenadine (10 mg and 120 mg) in another group. TNSS parameter was the main effectiveness parameter. Results: Evaluation of TNSS revealed significant difference (P < 0.05) when compared from baseline to 4(th) week in both groups. The mean change of TNSS, i.e., 9.46 was significant (P < 0.05) in montelukast-fexofenadine group. The cost-effectiveness ratio was less in montelukast-levocetirizine group than in montelukast-fexofenadine group. Conclusion: The decrease in TNSS was more in montelukast-fexofenadine group, but the cost-effectiveness is more with montelukast-levocetirizine combination.
机译:目的:过敏性鼻炎(AR)是一个全球性的健康问题。全世界将近10%至25%的人口受到AR影响。口服/鼻内H1-抗组胺药,减充血药,白三烯受体拮抗剂和鼻内皮质类固醇是AR治疗的支柱。孟鲁司特与抗组胺药的联合治疗可提供增强和互补的作用,从而有效减轻症状,但有关组合比较的数据很少。因此,我们旨在比较孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪和孟鲁司特-非索非那定联合治疗AR患者的疗效,安全性和成本效益。材料和方法:70例AR患者参加了一项为期4周的前瞻性,随机,双盲,平行,主动对照研究。这项研究纳入了年龄介于18u65岁之间的中度至重度间歇性或轻度持续性AR的患者。研究纳入标准要求患者的总鼻症状评分(TNSS)为5或更高。将患者随机分为两个治疗组,一组分别为孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪(10 mg和5 mg),另一组为孟鲁司特-非索非那定(10 mg和120 mg)。 TNSS参数是主要的有效性参数。结果:TNSS的评估显示,从基线到第4周,两组之间均存在显着差异(P <0.05)。孟鲁司特-非索非那定组的TNSS平均变化为9.46(P <0.05)。孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪组的成本-效果比低于孟鲁司特-非索非那定组。结论:孟鲁司特-非索非那定组TNSS的降低更多,但孟鲁司特-左西替利嗪联合使用的成本效益更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号