首页> 外文期刊>Engenharia Agricola >ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF THE VARIABLE RATE TECHNOLOGY COMPARED TO THE TRADITIONAL SYSTEM OF FERTILIZATION IN A COFFEE FIELD: A CASE STUDY
【24h】

ECONOMIC VIABILITY OF THE VARIABLE RATE TECHNOLOGY COMPARED TO THE TRADITIONAL SYSTEM OF FERTILIZATION IN A COFFEE FIELD: A CASE STUDY

机译:与咖啡田传统施肥系统相比,可变速率技术的经济可行性:案例研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The precision agriculture appears as an important tool to improve coffee field management, mainly to this culture that has high production costs. The present work intended to accomplish a comparative study of the economic feasibility of two fertilizer systems: one using the precision agriculture and other using conventional fertilization. The data base used were extracted from the production costs of the Brejao farm, in south of Minas Gerais, in three areas (22 ha, 10.52 ha and 6.23 ha), where were applied fertilizer in variable rates in the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 harvests. The precision agriculture was characterized by the georeferenced soil sampling and the application of phosphorus and potassium in variable rates. The conventional fertilization costs were obtained by simulations considering the traditional soil sampling performed at these areas. In order to compare the two fertilization systems, it was considered the operations and the amount of fertilizer necessary in each of the fertilization system. It was realized differences in the elements and in the amount that should be applied between the two systems. The variable rate fertilization was more profitable to the area of 22 ha and 10.52 ha in the two harvests studied and to the area of 6.23 ha was profitable (less prejudice) only to the last crop.
机译:精准农业似乎是改善咖啡田管理的重要工具,主要是针对这种生产成本高的文化。本工作旨在完成对两种肥料系统的经济可行性的比较研究:一种使用精准农业,另一种使用常规肥料。所使用的数据库是从米纳斯吉拉斯州南部Brejao农场的生产成本中提取的,该农场在三个地区(22公顷、10.52公顷和6.23公顷)在2007/2008年和2008/2009年的收成中以不同的速度施用肥料。精准农业的特点是地理参考土壤取样和磷和钾的可变速率施用。常规施肥成本是通过模拟获得的,考虑了在这些地区进行的传统土壤采样。为了比较两种施肥系统,考虑了每个施肥系统中所需的施肥量和施肥量。人们意识到两个系统之间应应用的元素和数量的差异。在所研究的两次收获中,可变施肥对22公顷和10.52公顷的面积更有利可图,而对6.23公顷的面积仅对最后一季作物有利可图(较少的偏见)。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号