首页> 外文期刊>Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery >Press fit fixation of cementless cups: how much stability do we need indeed?
【24h】

Press fit fixation of cementless cups: how much stability do we need indeed?

机译:无水泥吸盘的压接固定:我们到底需要多少稳定性?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction: Using screws for a better primary and secondary fixation has been discussed in the literature of the recent years, although the principle of press fit has been explained as the principle of a push-button. The authors wanted to compare their own results in patients using X-rays from the postoperative course to decide if it is really safer to use screws or not. Materials and methods: Two hundred and twenty one consecutive, not selected patients were treated with total hip arthroplasty using a cementless cup type Duraloc. They were followed up over a time of 5 years for radiological changes of the bony acetabulum around the cup ("acetabular zones" according to De Lee and Charnley). One hundred and ten cups were additionally fixed with one to three screws at the upper part in region C1, 101 cups were implanted without the use of screws. Results: Periprosthetic changes visible on the radiographs (immediate postoperative gaps, subsequent sclerosis and radiolucent lines) were assessed according to the time of their appearance. A gap in zone C2 was seen more often immediately after operation within the group without screws (17.8 vs. 7.3) and disappeared within the following 25 months. Within the group with screws significantly more often a gap was found in zone C1 and C3 compared to the group without screws (7.3 vs. 1.9). In the group with screws a sclerosis of the bone in zone C1 developed in 32.7 mostly within the first 5 months. It was followed by a radiolucent line in zone C3 in 28.2 mainly within 5-25 months postoperatively and in zone C1 in 20.9 within 16 months. Significantly less seldom were these phenomena seen at the cups without screw fixation. There was no correlation between lateral or medial positioning and deviations from the ideal inclination to the bony changes around the cups. No signs of loosening occurred in either group. Conclusion: Less radiological changes around the cup if no screws were used and no disadvantages within this group led to the conclusion that an additional screw fixation in principle is not necessary in press-fit cups.
机译:简介:近年来的文献中已经讨论了使用螺钉进行更好的初级和次级固定,尽管压合原理已被解释为按钮的原理。作者想比较他们自己在术后使用X射线的患者的结果,以确定使用螺钉是否真的更安全。材料和方法:221 名连续、未选择的患者使用无骨水泥杯型 Duraloc 进行全髋关节置换术治疗。他们接受了为期 5 年的随访,以检查杯子周围骨髋臼的放射学变化(根据 De Lee 和 Charnley 的说法是“髋臼区”)。在C1区域的上部用一到三个螺钉额外固定了110个杯子,在不使用螺钉的情况下植入了101个杯子。结果:根据X光片上可见的假体周围变化(术后即刻间隙、随后的硬化和射线可透线)进行评估。在没有螺钉的组内手术后,C2区间隙更常见(17.8%对7.3%),并在随后的25个月内消失。与没有螺钉的组相比,在有螺钉的组中,在C1区和C3区发现间隙的频率要高得多(7.3%对1.9%)。在螺钉组中,C1区骨硬化症的发生率为32.7%,主要在前5个月内发生。其次是 C3 区的射线可透线,主要在术后 5-25 个月内达到 28.2%,在 C1 区达到 20.9%,在术后 16 个月内达到 20.9%。在没有螺钉固定的杯子上看到这些现象的情况要少得多。侧向或内侧定位与理想倾斜度与杯子周围骨骼变化的偏差之间没有相关性。两组均未出现松动迹象。结论:如果不使用螺钉,则杯子周围的放射性变化较小,并且该组内没有缺点,因此得出的结论是,在压接杯中原则上不需要额外的螺钉固定。

著录项

获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号